Task Ambiguity in Combat Shooting Environments

Traditional military combat shooting training is typically static, highly structured, and planned. It often uses single-target engagements, lacking the requirement for friend and foe discrimination and fails to include the ambiguity and uncertainty of tasks found in real-world combat environments. This means that training may not successfully simulate combat challenges to survival and navigation of military environments. Here, we discuss an ecological dynamics approach to provide an alternative view of traditional military combat shooting training doctrine. We outline why this alternative view is advantageous for rethinking combat shooting training to prepare combatants for the uncertainties of the military environment. The paper introduces the concept of ‘task ambiguity’ and its constituent components: fields of affordances, action uncertainty, and changing informational constraints. We provide examples throughout from military and sporting contexts of how task ambiguity shapes perception, action, and cognition of performers. Last, we discuss practical implications for the training of combat shooters to create enskilled, adaptable combatants who can successfully navigate uncertain and ambiguous surroundings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7146/sjsep.v8i.150262
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Games
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Task Ambiguity in Combat Shooting Environments

Kane Middleton, Jack Harry Bale, Jonathan Wheat
Scandinavian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Artificial Intelligence in Games
article

Task Ambiguity in Combat Shooting Environments

Kane Middleton, Jack Harry Bale, Jonathan Wheat
article en

Abstract

Traditional military combat shooting training is typically static, highly structured, and planned. It often uses single-target engagements, lacking the requirement for friend and foe discrimination and fails to include the ambiguity and uncertainty of tasks found in real-world combat environments. This means that training may not successfully simulate combat challenges to survival and navigation of military environments. Here, we discuss an ecological dynamics approach to provide an alternative view of traditional military combat shooting training doctrine. We outline why this alternative view is advantageous for rethinking combat shooting training to prepare combatants for the uncertainties of the military environment. The paper introduces the concept of ‘task ambiguity’ and its constituent components: fields of affordances, action uncertainty, and changing informational constraints. We provide examples throughout from military and sporting contexts of how task ambiguity shapes perception, action, and cognition of performers. Last, we discuss practical implications for the training of combat shooters to create enskilled, adaptable combatants who can successfully navigate uncertain and ambiguous surroundings.

Scandinavian Journal of Sport and Exercise PsychologyVol. 8
La Trobe University (AU), Nottingham Trent University (GB), Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Artificial Intelligence in Games
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.