Psychometric validation of the Taiwanese nurse burnout scale

Nurse burnout has a negative impact on nurse retention, well-being, and the quality of patient care. The differences in healthcare systems and cultures also lead to the differences in perceptions of nurses burnout. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the nurse burnout scale, a context-specific instrument for Taiwanese nurses. This methodological study was conducted in three medical centers across Taiwan using secondary data from a National Science Council project. The Taiwan Nurse Burnout Scale (TNBS) was developed through literature review, qualitative interviews, expert validation, and pilot testing. Psychometric evaluation included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to assess construct validity, and reliability. Data were analyzed using SPSS and JASP to ensure the scale’s validity and reliability for assessing burnout among Taiwanese clinical nurses. The sample size of the final analytic sample was 529 nurses who were recruited in three medical Centers in Taiwan. A nine-factor and 42-item version of the Taiwanese Nurse Burnout Scale (TNBS) did not demonstrate the best fit indices in the confirmatory analysis, which led to the accounting of an alternative structural model. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the revised scale resulted in a five-factor, 19-item solution that explained 73.2 per cent. of the total variance. A following confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated acceptable fit, where the standardized loadings ranged between.58 to.95, average variance extracted (AVE) ranged between 0.58 and.85, the composite reliability was between.85 and. 94 and the Cronbach’s α 0.92 of the entire scale, thus validating the construct validity and reliability of the instrument. The five-dimensional, 19-item Taiwan Nurse Burnout Scale (TNBS) is indicated to have a strong psychometric face, thus making it an effective and reliable tool in the evaluation of burnout among Taiwanese clinical nursing groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04040-4
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric validation of the Taiwanese nurse burnout scale

Lin Chung-Ying, Dong Yanhong, Hsu Hsiang-Chin, Lee Huan-Fang et al.
BMC Psychology
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
article

Psychometric validation of the Taiwanese nurse burnout scale

Lin Chung-Ying, Dong Yanhong, Hsu Hsiang-Chin, Lee Huan-Fang, Yen Miaofen, Chen Meng-Ting, Chang Yi-Wen
article en

Abstract

Nurse burnout has a negative impact on nurse retention, well-being, and the quality of patient care. The differences in healthcare systems and cultures also lead to the differences in perceptions of nurses burnout. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the nurse burnout scale, a context-specific instrument for Taiwanese nurses. This methodological study was conducted in three medical centers across Taiwan using secondary data from a National Science Council project. The Taiwan Nurse Burnout Scale (TNBS) was developed through literature review, qualitative interviews, expert validation, and pilot testing. Psychometric evaluation included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to assess construct validity, and reliability. Data were analyzed using SPSS and JASP to ensure the scale’s validity and reliability for assessing burnout among Taiwanese clinical nurses. The sample size of the final analytic sample was 529 nurses who were recruited in three medical Centers in Taiwan. A nine-factor and 42-item version of the Taiwanese Nurse Burnout Scale (TNBS) did not demonstrate the best fit indices in the confirmatory analysis, which led to the accounting of an alternative structural model. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the revised scale resulted in a five-factor, 19-item solution that explained 73.2 per cent. of the total variance. A following confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated acceptable fit, where the standardized loadings ranged between.58 to.95, average variance extracted (AVE) ranged between 0.58 and.85, the composite reliability was between.85 and. 94 and the Cronbach’s α 0.92 of the entire scale, thus validating the construct validity and reliability of the instrument. The five-dimensional, 19-item Taiwan Nurse Burnout Scale (TNBS) is indicated to have a strong psychometric face, thus making it an effective and reliable tool in the evaluation of burnout among Taiwanese clinical nursing groups.

BMC Psychology
Kaohsiung Medical University (TW), National University of Singapore (SG), Chi Mei Medical Center (TW), National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW), National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.