Modern stone tool users from northern Kenya emphasize mass and edge length in the selection of cutting tools

The production and use of informal flake cutting tools played an essential role in foraging across human history. While much is known about the production of these tools, the attributes that facilitate their selection and use remain underexplored. This is because there remain few opportunities for the use of such tools in a traditional setting. The Daasanach of East Turkana, Kenya, maintain a tradition of stone tool production and use, affording the opportunity to investigate tool selection in a natural setting. Through interview and video documentation, we observed eight expert toolmakers complete butchery tasks, allowing us to link traditional technological knowledge governing cutting tool selection with measurable lithic attributes. Our findings reveal that factors such as edge angle, mass and grip significantly influence tool selection and cutting efficiency. These insights provide new perspectives on the functional relevance of informal cutting tools that are largely understood through experimentation. The outcomes of this study provide a venue for interpreting lithic variability in ancient contexts from the perspectives of traditional expert tool users. This research underscores the utility of detailed ethnographic studies to complement archaeological findings, enhancing our understanding of early human technological evolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-01-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.1371
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modern stone tool users from northern Kenya emphasize mass and edge length in the selection of cutting tools

Matthew Douglass, Emmanuel Ndiema, Lydia V. Luncz, Christine E. Haney et al.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

Modern stone tool users from northern Kenya emphasize mass and edge length in the selection of cutting tools

Matthew Douglass, Emmanuel Ndiema, Lydia V. Luncz, Christine E. Haney, Jonathan S. Reeves
article en

Abstract

The production and use of informal flake cutting tools played an essential role in foraging across human history. While much is known about the production of these tools, the attributes that facilitate their selection and use remain underexplored. This is because there remain few opportunities for the use of such tools in a traditional setting. The Daasanach of East Turkana, Kenya, maintain a tradition of stone tool production and use, affording the opportunity to investigate tool selection in a natural setting. Through interview and video documentation, we observed eight expert toolmakers complete butchery tasks, allowing us to link traditional technological knowledge governing cutting tool selection with measurable lithic attributes. Our findings reveal that factors such as edge angle, mass and grip significantly influence tool selection and cutting efficiency. These insights provide new perspectives on the functional relevance of informal cutting tools that are largely understood through experimentation. The outcomes of this study provide a venue for interpreting lithic variability in ancient contexts from the perspectives of traditional expert tool users. This research underscores the utility of detailed ethnographic studies to complement archaeological findings, enhancing our understanding of early human technological evolution.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 293(2063)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), George Washington University (US), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE), National Museums of Kenya (KE), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology (DE), University of Algarve (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.