Direct Shear Test Anomaly Detection Automation: Rule-Based and Neural Network Approaches for Geotechnical Laboratory Quality Control

The reliability of the data from geotechnical laboratories is an important issue for ensuring the safety and cost-effectiveness of infrastructure design. The DST, although widely used for soil shear strength parameters, is subject to anomalies from equipment drift, operator errors, and digitization problems. Manual review for large datasets is not practical, hence motivating the need for automation in quality control. This paper is concerned with developing and evaluating a complete anomaly detection tool for DST records. It combines a rule-based expert system with a neural network classifier. The workflow includes PDF data extraction, cleaning, feature engineering, and anomaly detection using 996 test records from 69 boreholes of major projects in Bangladesh. For the rule-based system, high transparency and expert agreement at 93% were achieved by flagging obvious anomalies related to implausible densities, water content inconsistencies, and cohesion errors. On the other hand, the neural network revealed adaptability by capturing subtle multivariate anomalies with 72.7% recall but lower precision at 37.2%. In comparative analysis, both approaches proved to possess complementary strengths: rules provide auditability and regulatory compliance, while neural networks increase coverage for complex error patterns. These findings support hybrid frameworks as the most robust solution for digital laboratory transformation, hence enabling scalable, transparent, and reliable geotechnical quality control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18397849
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct Shear Test Anomaly Detection Automation: Rule-Based and Neural Network Approaches for Geotechnical Laboratory Quality Control

Sandip Kumar Dey, Cherukuri Naresh
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Direct Shear Test Anomaly Detection Automation: Rule-Based and Neural Network Approaches for Geotechnical Laboratory Quality Control

Sandip Kumar Dey, Cherukuri Naresh
article en

Abstract

The reliability of the data from geotechnical laboratories is an important issue for ensuring the safety and cost-effectiveness of infrastructure design. The DST, although widely used for soil shear strength parameters, is subject to anomalies from equipment drift, operator errors, and digitization problems. Manual review for large datasets is not practical, hence motivating the need for automation in quality control. This paper is concerned with developing and evaluating a complete anomaly detection tool for DST records. It combines a rule-based expert system with a neural network classifier. The workflow includes PDF data extraction, cleaning, feature engineering, and anomaly detection using 996 test records from 69 boreholes of major projects in Bangladesh. For the rule-based system, high transparency and expert agreement at 93% were achieved by flagging obvious anomalies related to implausible densities, water content inconsistencies, and cohesion errors. On the other hand, the neural network revealed adaptability by capturing subtle multivariate anomalies with 72.7% recall but lower precision at 37.2%. In comparative analysis, both approaches proved to possess complementary strengths: rules provide auditability and regulatory compliance, while neural networks increase coverage for complex error patterns. These findings support hybrid frameworks as the most robust solution for digital laboratory transformation, hence enabling scalable, transparent, and reliable geotechnical quality control.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
GEI Consultants (US), South Asian University (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.