Competing Priorities in Participatory Research With Adolescents: Reflections on Achieving Meaningful Participation for Intervention Development in Samoa and Nepal

Participatory approaches to research with adolescents are often seen as inherently superior to other qualitative methods because of their potential to redress power imbalances and enhance engagement. In reality, implementing participatory approaches is resource intensive and a complex balancing act where compromises have to be made. In this article, we share our experiences of using participatory approaches for intervention development with adolescents in Samoa and Nepal as part of two independent research projects. We reflect critically on the challenges we faced in relation to ethics, power dynamics, logistics, data quality, and benefits to participants, and how they shaped the meaningful participation of adolescents. We argue that encouraging reflexivity and discussion about the challenges and compromises we make in our research not only provides a space to learn from each other, but can enable more impactful and transformative participatory research with adolescents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069261416766
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
55.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Competing Priorities in Participatory Research With Adolescents: Reflections on Achieving Meaningful Participation for Intervention Development in Samoa and Nepal

Kelly Rose‐Clarke, Hattie Lowe, Joanna Morrison
1 citations
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Participatory Visual Research Methods
55.57
article

Competing Priorities in Participatory Research With Adolescents: Reflections on Achieving Meaningful Participation for Intervention Development in Samoa and Nepal

Kelly Rose‐Clarke, Hattie Lowe, Joanna Morrison
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Participatory approaches to research with adolescents are often seen as inherently superior to other qualitative methods because of their potential to redress power imbalances and enhance engagement. In reality, implementing participatory approaches is resource intensive and a complex balancing act where compromises have to be made. In this article, we share our experiences of using participatory approaches for intervention development with adolescents in Samoa and Nepal as part of two independent research projects. We reflect critically on the challenges we faced in relation to ethics, power dynamics, logistics, data quality, and benefits to participants, and how they shaped the meaningful participation of adolescents. We argue that encouraging reflexivity and discussion about the challenges and compromises we make in our research not only provides a space to learn from each other, but can enable more impactful and transformative participatory research with adolescents.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 25
University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
55.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.