Demonstrative TO in Polish

This paper offers an LRFG analysis of the Polish demonstrative word to, which may occur in two syntactic environments: (i) in typical nominal positions and (ii) in the unique copular structure TO + BY´Ć ‘to be’ + NP, in which the right-hand NP appears in the nominative case and triggers agreement with the copula. In (i), to may only refer to antecedents lacking number and gender (e.g. clauses), whereas in (ii) it may refer to any antecedent. To is analysed as one underspecified vocabulary item exponing two structures: a noun lacking number and gender in (I) and a demonstrative identifier in (ii). The difference in their anaphoric possibilities follows from blocking: to is blocked in (i) by personal pronouns whenever the antecedent has number and gender, due to an anaphoric agreement mechanism and the specification of vocabulary items.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18148/lfg/2024.v29i.52
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demonstrative TO in Polish

Sebastian Zawada
Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

Demonstrative TO in Polish

Sebastian Zawada
article en

Abstract

This paper offers an LRFG analysis of the Polish demonstrative word to, which may occur in two syntactic environments: (i) in typical nominal positions and (ii) in the unique copular structure TO + BY´Ć ‘to be’ + NP, in which the right-hand NP appears in the nominative case and triggers agreement with the copula. In (i), to may only refer to antecedents lacking number and gender (e.g. clauses), whereas in (ii) it may refer to any antecedent. To is analysed as one underspecified vocabulary item exponing two structures: a noun lacking number and gender in (I) and a demonstrative identifier in (ii). The difference in their anaphoric possibilities follows from blocking: to is blocked in (i) by personal pronouns whenever the antecedent has number and gender, due to an anaphoric agreement mechanism and the specification of vocabulary items.

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Computer Science (CZ), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.