Development and validation of the critical care practical competency scale for clinical nurses

To develop a Critical Care Practical Competency Scale (CCPCS) for clinical nurses, and to assess its reliability and validity. The scale was developed through a literature review, semi-structured interviews, and Delphi expert consultation. A convenience sampling method was employed to survey in-service clinical nurses from three tertiary Class A general hospitals in Anhui Province, followed by an item analysis and assessment of the scale’s reliability and validity. The CCPCS for nurses comprised 3 dimensions and 22 items. The Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.97, the partial coefficient was 0.91, and the retest reliability coefficient was 0.85. The Scale-Level Content Validity Index/Average (S-CVI/AVE) was 0.98, Scale-Content Validity Index/Universal Agreement (S-CVI/UA) was 0.93, with the Item-Level Content Validity Index (I-CVI) ranging from 0.83 to 1.00. Exploratory factor analysis revealed three common factors, explaining a cumulative variance contribution rate of 73.21%. The CCPCS for nurses exhibited robust reliability and validity, laying a foundational basis for training and assessing critical care nursing skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nursing
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-04339-y
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of the critical care practical competency scale for clinical nurses

X. M. Bao, Xiubin Tao, Pingping Jiang, Dan Qin et al.
BMC Nursing
Nursing education and management
article

Development and validation of the critical care practical competency scale for clinical nurses

X. M. Bao, Xiubin Tao, Pingping Jiang, Dan Qin, Lijuan Zhang, Zhongtao Zhou, Miaomiao Yan
article en

Abstract

To develop a Critical Care Practical Competency Scale (CCPCS) for clinical nurses, and to assess its reliability and validity. The scale was developed through a literature review, semi-structured interviews, and Delphi expert consultation. A convenience sampling method was employed to survey in-service clinical nurses from three tertiary Class A general hospitals in Anhui Province, followed by an item analysis and assessment of the scale’s reliability and validity. The CCPCS for nurses comprised 3 dimensions and 22 items. The Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.97, the partial coefficient was 0.91, and the retest reliability coefficient was 0.85. The Scale-Level Content Validity Index/Average (S-CVI/AVE) was 0.98, Scale-Content Validity Index/Universal Agreement (S-CVI/UA) was 0.93, with the Item-Level Content Validity Index (I-CVI) ranging from 0.83 to 1.00. Exploratory factor analysis revealed three common factors, explaining a cumulative variance contribution rate of 73.21%. The CCPCS for nurses exhibited robust reliability and validity, laying a foundational basis for training and assessing critical care nursing skills.

BMC NursingVol. 25(1)
Wannan Medical College (CN), Bengbu Medical College (CN), Anhui Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.