Beyond Manoeuvre Theory for European Defence

ABSTRACT This article contributes to the debate about European defence in the light of the Russo‐Ukraine war and growing doubts about US commitment to Europe. It argues that Europeans need to fundamentally relearn the ability to imagine military strategy from a European viewpoint. In a first step, we investigate the influence of manoeuvre theory in NATO thinking. In a second step, we engage with the growing manoeuvre‐critical literature and come to the conclusion that manoeuvre theory does not hold the answer for European strategic challenges vis‐à‐vis Russia. In a third step, we reappraise alternative defence concepts mainly developed in West Germany during the 1980s as a source for rethinking European conventional defence and deterrence in the nuclear age. We argue that, even though concepts such as ‘spider‐in‐the‐web’ do not offer ready‐made blueprints, they do provide conceptual impulses to (re)think positional defence in the nuclear age. Finally, we point out avenues for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70130
Primary Topic
Military History and Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Manoeuvre Theory for European Defence

Lukas Mengelkamp, Sam Vincent
Global Policy
Military History and Strategy
article

Beyond Manoeuvre Theory for European Defence

Lukas Mengelkamp, Sam Vincent
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article contributes to the debate about European defence in the light of the Russo‐Ukraine war and growing doubts about US commitment to Europe. It argues that Europeans need to fundamentally relearn the ability to imagine military strategy from a European viewpoint. In a first step, we investigate the influence of manoeuvre theory in NATO thinking. In a second step, we engage with the growing manoeuvre‐critical literature and come to the conclusion that manoeuvre theory does not hold the answer for European strategic challenges vis‐à‐vis Russia. In a third step, we reappraise alternative defence concepts mainly developed in West Germany during the 1980s as a source for rethinking European conventional defence and deterrence in the nuclear age. We argue that, even though concepts such as ‘spider‐in‐the‐web’ do not offer ready‐made blueprints, they do provide conceptual impulses to (re)think positional defence in the nuclear age. Finally, we point out avenues for future research.

Global Policy
Universität Hamburg (DE), Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy (DE), Local Government Improvement and Development (GB)
Carnegie Corporation of New York, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Military History and Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.