Improving olfactory assessment: an item response theory analysis of the American English version of the Sniffin’ sticks identification subtest

These findings support the use of IRT to identify poorly performing items, enabling the refinement of the SSET, to enhance its precision and reliability across populations. Future research should explore item revisions and extend psychometric evaluations to other subtests and samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1661164
Primary Topic
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving olfactory assessment: an item response theory analysis of the American English version of the Sniffin’ sticks identification subtest

Eva Tolomeo, Leognano Ceraudo, Ryann Delaney Kolb, Valentina Parma et al.
Frontiers in Psychology
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
article

Improving olfactory assessment: an item response theory analysis of the American English version of the Sniffin’ sticks identification subtest

Eva Tolomeo, Leognano Ceraudo, Ryann Delaney Kolb, Valentina Parma, Marco Tullio Liuzza, Pamela H. Dalton
article en

Abstract

These findings support the use of IRT to identify poorly performing items, enabling the refinement of the SSET, to enhance its precision and reliability across populations. Future research should explore item revisions and extend psychometric evaluations to other subtests and samples.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
University of Padua (IT), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), Monell Chemical Senses Center (US), Magna Graecia University (IT)
Università degli Studi di Padova, National Institutes of Health
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.