Cyber security awareness campaigns in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Do they still fail to change behaviour?

Cyber security awareness and training programmes are the primary mechanism used to manage risks associated with people within organisations and across countries. Ten years ago, we examined such campaigns and identified several factors that explained why they often fail to bring about the intended behaviour change. Since then, the security landscape has evolved substantially, with developments such as generative artificial intelligence (AI), remote working, and increasing security fatigue introducing new and significant risks. In this paper, we conduct an updated analysis to examine whether more recent security awareness campaigns have improved and are consequently more likely to result in behaviour change. Specifically, we present a ten year retrospective of national cyber security awareness campaigns (2015–2025) across five global regions. Through thematic analysis of campaign materials, we identify continued reliance on fear based, information-heavy messaging, inconsistent calls to action, and persistent structural barriers. We conclude that without realignment to behavioural drivers and real-world constraints, particularly in an AI-augmented threat landscape, awareness campaigns are likely to repeat familiar failures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Published
2026-01-26
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cyber security awareness campaigns in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Do they still fail to change behaviour?

Jason R. C. Nurse, Maria Bada
Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Information and Cyber Security
article

Cyber security awareness campaigns in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Do they still fail to change behaviour?

Jason R. C. Nurse, Maria Bada
article en

Abstract

Cyber security awareness and training programmes are the primary mechanism used to manage risks associated with people within organisations and across countries. Ten years ago, we examined such campaigns and identified several factors that explained why they often fail to bring about the intended behaviour change. Since then, the security landscape has evolved substantially, with developments such as generative artificial intelligence (AI), remote working, and increasing security fatigue introducing new and significant risks. In this paper, we conduct an updated analysis to examine whether more recent security awareness campaigns have improved and are consequently more likely to result in behaviour change. Specifically, we present a ten year retrospective of national cyber security awareness campaigns (2015–2025) across five global regions. Through thematic analysis of campaign materials, we identify continued reliance on fear based, information-heavy messaging, inconsistent calls to action, and persistent structural barriers. We conclude that without realignment to behavioural drivers and real-world constraints, particularly in an AI-augmented threat landscape, awareness campaigns are likely to repeat familiar failures.

Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.