The ABCs of Nazism: The Political Screening and Classification of German Prisoners of War in Britain in the Aftermath of the Second World War

Abstract Nearly half a million German prisoners of war were in Britain when the Second World War ended, all of whom were sorted into one of three categories: anti-Nazi, unpolitical, or Nazi, correspondingly known as A, B, C. This article focuses on the screening process that determined in which category an individual belonged. It traces the thinking that informed this process, the logic behind the assessment criteria used, and the impact it had on prisoners. Screening was conceived at a time when support for National Socialism was pathologised and blamed on a German ‘national character’. However, as the article shows, the process of screening POWs did not reflect such notions. Instead it reflected a recognition that Germans had consciously supported the regime for different reasons and to different degrees. Through a quantitative analysis of 400,000 screenings, it is shown that there was no tendency to see all Germans as Nazis, despite wartime rhetoric conflating the two. Instead, the criteria for classifying POWs were increasingly designed to achieve practical policy aims. Screening became a convenient tool through which to organise several policies that affected prisoners—re-education, denazification, labour and repatriation—rendering it a process that fundamentally shaped post-war internment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The English Historical Review
Published
2025-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/ceaf151
Primary Topic
European history and politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ABCs of Nazism: The Political Screening and Classification of German Prisoners of War in Britain in the Aftermath of the Second World War

Artemis Photiadou
The English Historical Review
European history and politics
article

The ABCs of Nazism: The Political Screening and Classification of German Prisoners of War in Britain in the Aftermath of the Second World War

Artemis Photiadou
article en

Abstract

Abstract Nearly half a million German prisoners of war were in Britain when the Second World War ended, all of whom were sorted into one of three categories: anti-Nazi, unpolitical, or Nazi, correspondingly known as A, B, C. This article focuses on the screening process that determined in which category an individual belonged. It traces the thinking that informed this process, the logic behind the assessment criteria used, and the impact it had on prisoners. Screening was conceived at a time when support for National Socialism was pathologised and blamed on a German ‘national character’. However, as the article shows, the process of screening POWs did not reflect such notions. Instead it reflected a recognition that Germans had consciously supported the regime for different reasons and to different degrees. Through a quantitative analysis of 400,000 screenings, it is shown that there was no tendency to see all Germans as Nazis, despite wartime rhetoric conflating the two. Instead, the criteria for classifying POWs were increasingly designed to achieve practical policy aims. Screening became a convenient tool through which to organise several policies that affected prisoners—re-education, denazification, labour and repatriation—rendering it a process that fundamentally shaped post-war internment.

The English Historical Review
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
European history and politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.