Beyond efficiency: Reconciling Singer’s effective altruism with care ethics

Abstract This article reviews Peter Singer’s concept of Effective Altruism (EA) through the lens of care ethics and proposes a preliminary idea for their integration. Singer advocates for maximizing good through efficiency-driven moral practices, such as pursuing high-income careers to increase charitable donations or supporting interventions like farm animal welfare that promise significant measurable impact. However, from the perspective of care ethics (CE), this approach overlooks the importance of personal relationships and emotional bonds. Additionally, its outcome-oriented reasoning may lead to neglecting the most vulnerable groups, potentially sacrificing individual rights in favor of maximizing overall well-being. To ensure that EA evolves and remains relevant, especially in humanitarian work, integrating it with CE presents a promising path forward. By balancing EA’s focus on maximizing impact with CE’s emphasis on relational responsibility, contextual awareness, and emotional engagement, we can develop a more holistic ethical framework for humanitarian action. This integrated approach could also foster a more robust and equitable vision of global development and social justice, one that values both effective outcomes and the dignity and agency of those affected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics & bioethics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2025-0013
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond efficiency: Reconciling Singer’s effective altruism with care ethics

Sitian Liu
Ethics & bioethics
Social Work Education and Practice
article

Beyond efficiency: Reconciling Singer’s effective altruism with care ethics

Sitian Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article reviews Peter Singer’s concept of Effective Altruism (EA) through the lens of care ethics and proposes a preliminary idea for their integration. Singer advocates for maximizing good through efficiency-driven moral practices, such as pursuing high-income careers to increase charitable donations or supporting interventions like farm animal welfare that promise significant measurable impact. However, from the perspective of care ethics (CE), this approach overlooks the importance of personal relationships and emotional bonds. Additionally, its outcome-oriented reasoning may lead to neglecting the most vulnerable groups, potentially sacrificing individual rights in favor of maximizing overall well-being. To ensure that EA evolves and remains relevant, especially in humanitarian work, integrating it with CE presents a promising path forward. By balancing EA’s focus on maximizing impact with CE’s emphasis on relational responsibility, contextual awareness, and emotional engagement, we can develop a more holistic ethical framework for humanitarian action. This integrated approach could also foster a more robust and equitable vision of global development and social justice, one that values both effective outcomes and the dignity and agency of those affected.

Ethics & bioethicsVol. 15(3-4)
Guangxi University (CN), Guangxi University of Science and Technology (CN)
Harvard University, University of Oxford, Guangxi University
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Social Work Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.