Hydraulic Asymmetries for Biological and Bioinspired Valves in Tubular Channels: A Numerical Analysis

Biological, biomimetic, and engineering systems make extensive use of hydraulic asymmetries to control flow inside tubular structures. Examples span physiological valves, the guided transport observed in shark intestines, and passive devices such as Tesla valves. Here we investigate the mechanisms that generate these asymmetries using the notion of diodicity, defined as the ratio between pressure drops required to drive the same flow in opposite directions. We first focus on 2D geometries, which allow us to identify and study the main contributions to hydraulic asymmetry: channel geometry and internal obstacles embedded within a channel with rigid walls. By considering both rigid and deformable obstacles, we model channels that always remain open in both directions and channels that can be completely blocked by valve-like structures. We then extend the analysis to 3D geometries, again considering rigid and elastic cases. As a general trend, we find that geometry alone establishes a baseline diodicity, while higher dimensionality and structural reconfiguration consistently amplify the effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomimetics
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics11020087
Primary Topic
Soft Robotics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydraulic Asymmetries for Biological and Bioinspired Valves in Tubular Channels: A Numerical Analysis

Antonio DeSimone, Daniele Agostinelli, Francesco Varnier, Reza Norouzikudiani et al.
Biomimetics
Soft Robotics and Applications
article

Hydraulic Asymmetries for Biological and Bioinspired Valves in Tubular Channels: A Numerical Analysis

Antonio DeSimone, Daniele Agostinelli, Francesco Varnier, Reza Norouzikudiani, Giovanni Corsi, Ido Levin
article en

Abstract

Biological, biomimetic, and engineering systems make extensive use of hydraulic asymmetries to control flow inside tubular structures. Examples span physiological valves, the guided transport observed in shark intestines, and passive devices such as Tesla valves. Here we investigate the mechanisms that generate these asymmetries using the notion of diodicity, defined as the ratio between pressure drops required to drive the same flow in opposite directions. We first focus on 2D geometries, which allow us to identify and study the main contributions to hydraulic asymmetry: channel geometry and internal obstacles embedded within a channel with rigid walls. By considering both rigid and deformable obstacles, we model channels that always remain open in both directions and channels that can be completely blocked by valve-like structures. We then extend the analysis to 3D geometries, again considering rigid and elastic cases. As a general trend, we find that geometry alone establishes a baseline diodicity, while higher dimensionality and structural reconfiguration consistently amplify the effect.

BiomimeticsVol. 11(2)
Marche Polytechnic University (IT), Piaggio (Italy) (IT), Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT), University of British Columbia (CA), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Soft Robotics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.