Safety and Feasibility of Concomitant Urogynecologic and Gynecologic Oncology Surgical Procedures
This joint Clinical Consensus Statement on the safety and feasibility of concomitant urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgical procedures reflects statements drafted by content experts from the American Urogynecologic Society and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. The writing group used a Delphi process to evaluate statements developed from a structured literature search and assessed consensus. A total of 35 statements were assessed in the following categories: (1) background, (2) treatment options, (3) timing of concurrent surgery, (4) risk factors, and (5) value-based care. Of the 35 statements, 28 reached consensus on initial review. Three statements were omitted, and 4 statements were revised and reached consensus following second review utilizing the Delphi process.
Authors
- Gena C. Dunivan
- Marina Frimer
- Elizabeth Lokich
- Jon Pennycuff
- David D. Rahn
- Ira Winer
- John Occhino
- Denise Uyar
- Holly E. Richter
- Kari Ring
- Katina Robison
- Kyle Wohlrab
Institutions
- Tufts Medical Center (US)
- Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
- University of Virginia Health System (US)
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute (US)
- Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (US)
- Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Urogynecology
- Published
- 2025-12-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001804
- Primary Topic
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00