Safety and Feasibility of Concomitant Urogynecologic and Gynecologic Oncology Surgical Procedures

This joint Clinical Consensus Statement on the safety and feasibility of concomitant urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgical procedures reflects statements drafted by content experts from the American Urogynecologic Society and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. The writing group used a Delphi process to evaluate statements developed from a structured literature search and assessed consensus. A total of 35 statements were assessed in the following categories: (1) background, (2) treatment options, (3) timing of concurrent surgery, (4) risk factors, and (5) value-based care. Of the 35 statements, 28 reached consensus on initial review. Three statements were omitted, and 4 statements were revised and reached consensus following second review utilizing the Delphi process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urogynecology
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001804
Primary Topic
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and Feasibility of Concomitant Urogynecologic and Gynecologic Oncology Surgical Procedures

Gena C. Dunivan, Marina Frimer, Elizabeth Lokich, Jon Pennycuff et al.
Urogynecology
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
article

Safety and Feasibility of Concomitant Urogynecologic and Gynecologic Oncology Surgical Procedures

Gena C. Dunivan, Marina Frimer, Elizabeth Lokich, Jon Pennycuff, David D. Rahn, Ira Winer, John Occhino, Denise Uyar, Holly E. Richter, Kari Ring, Katina Robison, Kyle Wohlrab
article en

Abstract

This joint Clinical Consensus Statement on the safety and feasibility of concomitant urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology surgical procedures reflects statements drafted by content experts from the American Urogynecologic Society and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. The writing group used a Delphi process to evaluate statements developed from a structured literature search and assessed consensus. A total of 35 statements were assessed in the following categories: (1) background, (2) treatment options, (3) timing of concurrent surgery, (4) risk factors, and (5) value-based care. Of the 35 statements, 28 reached consensus on initial review. Three statements were omitted, and 4 statements were revised and reached consensus following second review utilizing the Delphi process.

UrogynecologyVol. 32(2)
Tufts Medical Center (US), Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US), Mayo Clinic (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), University of Virginia Health System (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute (US), Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (US), Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Pelvic floor disorders treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Safety and Feasibility of Concomitant Urogynecologic and Gynecologic Oncology Surgical Procedures — Gena C. Dunivan, Marina Frimer, et al. · Urogynecology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS