The Informational Basis of Social Choice under Model Uncertainty: The Transparency Paradox and the Impossibility of Robustness under Public Witnessing

Classical impossibility theorems in social choice are axiomatic: they derive infeasibility fromlogical incompatibilities among transitivity, Pareto, IIA, and non-dictatorship. This paperisolates a different obstruction: an informational incompatibility between Transparency andRobustness under model uncertainty with strategic frame control.We formalize institutional admissibility constraints as σ-fields Gxy governing pairwise decisions.Under spurious unanimity—expressed unanimity on (x, y) while the informed comparison flipsacross feasible frames—any expressed-Pareto rule misranks with probability at least the posteriormass of frames whose informed ordering disagrees with the forced output. Witness evidenceexcluded by Gxy appears to offer an escape: MAP triangulation of the latent frame achieves anexponential error decay controlled by the minimal Chernoff information Cmin.The main result reverses this conclusion once transparency is imposed on witnessing. Ina public witnessing regime, the strategic Sender observes the witness signal (or equivalentlyknows the test statistic voters will apply) before the downstream action. This expanded timingallows the Sender to solve a belief-space analogue of drift cancellation from Fathi [6]: the Senderselects frame mixtures conditional on the witness so that the voters’ posterior does not move,μh(· | E) = μh(·) a.s. Consequently the induced witness channel becomes statistically degenerate:for every pair of frames (f, g), the pairwise Chernoff information collapses to zero, C(f, g) = 0,and the minimax error exponent collapses to zero. Hence Transparency destroys Robustness:“sunshine” converts witnesses from measurements of truth into targets of stabilization.This extends the Bateson Game logic of dynamically stabilized certainty traps to socialchoice, and yields a Goodhartian principle for institutions: once the witness metric is known, itceases to be a measure of truth and becomes a control variable for the Sender.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18382337
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Informational Basis of Social Choice under Model Uncertainty: The Transparency Paradox and the Impossibility of Robustness under Public Witnessing

Kevin Fathi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

The Informational Basis of Social Choice under Model Uncertainty: The Transparency Paradox and the Impossibility of Robustness under Public Witnessing

Kevin Fathi
article en

Abstract

Classical impossibility theorems in social choice are axiomatic: they derive infeasibility fromlogical incompatibilities among transitivity, Pareto, IIA, and non-dictatorship. This paperisolates a different obstruction: an informational incompatibility between Transparency andRobustness under model uncertainty with strategic frame control.We formalize institutional admissibility constraints as σ-fields Gxy governing pairwise decisions.Under spurious unanimity—expressed unanimity on (x, y) while the informed comparison flipsacross feasible frames—any expressed-Pareto rule misranks with probability at least the posteriormass of frames whose informed ordering disagrees with the forced output. Witness evidenceexcluded by Gxy appears to offer an escape: MAP triangulation of the latent frame achieves anexponential error decay controlled by the minimal Chernoff information Cmin.The main result reverses this conclusion once transparency is imposed on witnessing. Ina public witnessing regime, the strategic Sender observes the witness signal (or equivalentlyknows the test statistic voters will apply) before the downstream action. This expanded timingallows the Sender to solve a belief-space analogue of drift cancellation from Fathi [6]: the Senderselects frame mixtures conditional on the witness so that the voters’ posterior does not move,μh(· | E) = μh(·) a.s. Consequently the induced witness channel becomes statistically degenerate:for every pair of frames (f, g), the pairwise Chernoff information collapses to zero, C(f, g) = 0,and the minimax error exponent collapses to zero. Hence Transparency destroys Robustness:“sunshine” converts witnesses from measurements of truth into targets of stabilization.This extends the Bateson Game logic of dynamically stabilized certainty traps to socialchoice, and yields a Goodhartian principle for institutions: once the witness metric is known, itceases to be a measure of truth and becomes a control variable for the Sender.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.