A Quest for the Mechanism of Ultrahigh Resolution SEM Imaging

The long-standing view in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) holds that SE1 electrons determine image resolution, whereas SE2 electrons contribute mainly to the background. However, the quantitative relationship between SE1/SE2 emission and spatial resolution has never been rigorously established due to the lack of explicit definitions for SE1 and SE2 for a Monte Carlo simulation. In this study, we develop a comprehensive simulation framework with unambiguous SE1/SE2 definitions to investigate secondary electron emission from typical solid materials by a 0.1-30 keV primary beam. The results reveal that SE1 and SE2 exhibit no intrinsic difference in emission characteristics except for the spatial spreading, and the local 3D morphology of the surface shall modulate SE2 spatial emission. Simulations for Au nanoparticles on a carbon substrate illustrate that the morphology-modulated SE2 electrons near particle edges contribute significantly to sub-nanometer resolution (∼0.8 nm); the exclusion of SE3 by the in-lens detector also plays a role in resolution enhancement. This work overturns the conventional consideration that SE2 degrades resolution, and provides a unified physical explanation for the mechanism of ultrahigh-resolution SEM imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Science
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202516341
Primary Topic
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Quest for the Mechanism of Ultrahigh Resolution SEM Imaging

Y.B. Zou, Hao Tian Chen, Z.J. Ding, B. Da
Advanced Science
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
article

A Quest for the Mechanism of Ultrahigh Resolution SEM Imaging

Y.B. Zou, Hao Tian Chen, Z.J. Ding, B. Da
article en

Abstract

The long-standing view in scanning electron microscopy (SEM) holds that SE1 electrons determine image resolution, whereas SE2 electrons contribute mainly to the background. However, the quantitative relationship between SE1/SE2 emission and spatial resolution has never been rigorously established due to the lack of explicit definitions for SE1 and SE2 for a Monte Carlo simulation. In this study, we develop a comprehensive simulation framework with unambiguous SE1/SE2 definitions to investigate secondary electron emission from typical solid materials by a 0.1-30 keV primary beam. The results reveal that SE1 and SE2 exhibit no intrinsic difference in emission characteristics except for the spatial spreading, and the local 3D morphology of the surface shall modulate SE2 spatial emission. Simulations for Au nanoparticles on a carbon substrate illustrate that the morphology-modulated SE2 electrons near particle edges contribute significantly to sub-nanometer resolution (∼0.8 nm); the exclusion of SE3 by the in-lens detector also plays a role in resolution enhancement. This work overturns the conventional consideration that SE2 degrades resolution, and provides a unified physical explanation for the mechanism of ultrahigh-resolution SEM imaging.

Advanced ScienceVol. 13(17)
Xinjiang Normal University (CN), National Institute for Materials Science (JP), Hefei National Center for Physical Sciences at Nanoscale (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Quest for the Mechanism of Ultrahigh Resolution SEM Imaging — Y.B. Zou, Hao Tian Chen, et al. · Advanced Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS