Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of pharmacotherapy of patients with diabetic foot syndrome secondary to type 2 diabetes mellitus

The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by diabetic foot syndrome and the prescription of high-cost medicines, which are not included in treatment protocols, significantly raise healthcare expenditures and worsen patient outcomes, making the optimisation of pharmacotherapy both a clinical and economic priority. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rationality of pharmacotherapy for patients with diabetic foot syndrome using an integrated frequency/ABC/VEN analysis. The study applied frequency analysis to assess prescription patterns ATC-classification, ABC-analysis to classify medicines by expenditure levels, and VEN-analysis to determine their therapeutic importance based on national and international treatment guidelines recommendations for type 2 diabetes mellitus. The results demonstrated that etiological and pathogenetic therapies approaches predominated in clinical practice. Antidiabetic agents accounted for the largest share of prescriptions (23%), while antibiotics were essential for managing infectious complications. The integrated frequency/ABC/VEN-analyses revealed that “essential” medicines (44.19%) predominated over “vital” (23.26%) and “non-essential” categories (32.56%), indicating the insufficiently rational prescribing practices in accordance with treatment recommendations. However, a high share of healthcare expenditures was concentrated in a group of high-cost medicines (34.89%), suggesting suboptimal allocation of healthcare resources. The results also highlighted the importance of evidence-based antibiotic selection due to the growing risk of antimicrobial resistance. The study provided a foundation for improving the economic efficiency of pharmacotherapy in patients with diabetic foot syndrome by supporting rational prescribing, optimisation of healthcare expenditures, and the promotion of cost-effective Ukrainian medicines alternatives

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Medicine and Medical Research
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63341/ijmmr/2.2025.120
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of pharmacotherapy of patients with diabetic foot syndrome secondary to type 2 diabetes mellitus

Halyna Mykhailyshyn, Mariana Demchuk, Olena Pokotylo, Iryna Volch et al.
International Journal of Medicine and Medical Research
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of pharmacotherapy of patients with diabetic foot syndrome secondary to type 2 diabetes mellitus

Halyna Mykhailyshyn, Mariana Demchuk, Olena Pokotylo, Iryna Volch, Anastasiia Dub
article en

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated by diabetic foot syndrome and the prescription of high-cost medicines, which are not included in treatment protocols, significantly raise healthcare expenditures and worsen patient outcomes, making the optimisation of pharmacotherapy both a clinical and economic priority. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rationality of pharmacotherapy for patients with diabetic foot syndrome using an integrated frequency/ABC/VEN analysis. The study applied frequency analysis to assess prescription patterns ATC-classification, ABC-analysis to classify medicines by expenditure levels, and VEN-analysis to determine their therapeutic importance based on national and international treatment guidelines recommendations for type 2 diabetes mellitus. The results demonstrated that etiological and pathogenetic therapies approaches predominated in clinical practice. Antidiabetic agents accounted for the largest share of prescriptions (23%), while antibiotics were essential for managing infectious complications. The integrated frequency/ABC/VEN-analyses revealed that “essential” medicines (44.19%) predominated over “vital” (23.26%) and “non-essential” categories (32.56%), indicating the insufficiently rational prescribing practices in accordance with treatment recommendations. However, a high share of healthcare expenditures was concentrated in a group of high-cost medicines (34.89%), suggesting suboptimal allocation of healthcare resources. The results also highlighted the importance of evidence-based antibiotic selection due to the growing risk of antimicrobial resistance. The study provided a foundation for improving the economic efficiency of pharmacotherapy in patients with diabetic foot syndrome by supporting rational prescribing, optimisation of healthcare expenditures, and the promotion of cost-effective Ukrainian medicines alternatives

International Journal of Medicine and Medical ResearchVol. 11(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.