Conservative Management Versus Arthroscopic Repair for Symptomatic Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tears: A Prospective Comparative Analytical Study

Introduction The optimal management of symptomatic partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (Ellman Grade II and III) remains controversial. While meta-analyses exist for full-thickness tears, prospective comparative data specifically for these intermediate lesions is limited. This study compared the functional outcomes of structured conservative rehabilitation versus arthroscopic repair to determine therapeutic efficacy. Methods A prospective comparative analytical study was conducted involving 50 patients with MRI-confirmed symptomatic partial-thickness supraspinatus tears. Patients were allocated to either conservative management (n=25) involving a supervised FITT-based rehabilitation protocol or arthroscopic repair (n=25) based on shared decision-making. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months. Results Baseline characteristics were well-matched. At six months, both groups demonstrated significant functional improvement, with no statistically significant difference in final CMS (conservative: 75.7 ± 5.9 vs. surgical: 75.0 ± 6.7; p=0.723). The conservative group demonstrated a significant early functional advantage at 1 month (p<0.001) due to the avoidance of postoperative immobilization. While the surgical group achieved statistically lower absolute pain scores at 6 months (p=0.007), the mean difference (0.40 points) did not exceed the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). Conclusion Structured conservative management yields short-term functional outcomes equivalent to arthroscopic repair for symptomatic partial-thickness supraspinatus tears, with the added benefit of faster early recovery. These findings support conservative care as a robust first-line strategy. Limitations include the non-randomized design and short-term follow-up, necessitating future longitudinal research to assess tear progression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.102351
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conservative Management Versus Arthroscopic Repair for Symptomatic Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tears: A Prospective Comparative Analytical Study

Jagdeep Rehncy, Girish Sahni, Saurav Soni, Daljinder Singh et al.
Cureus
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Conservative Management Versus Arthroscopic Repair for Symptomatic Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tears: A Prospective Comparative Analytical Study

Jagdeep Rehncy, Girish Sahni, Saurav Soni, Daljinder Singh, Prateek Khanna, Sachin Goel, Nirnhai Singh
article en

Abstract

Introduction The optimal management of symptomatic partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (Ellman Grade II and III) remains controversial. While meta-analyses exist for full-thickness tears, prospective comparative data specifically for these intermediate lesions is limited. This study compared the functional outcomes of structured conservative rehabilitation versus arthroscopic repair to determine therapeutic efficacy. Methods A prospective comparative analytical study was conducted involving 50 patients with MRI-confirmed symptomatic partial-thickness supraspinatus tears. Patients were allocated to either conservative management (n=25) involving a supervised FITT-based rehabilitation protocol or arthroscopic repair (n=25) based on shared decision-making. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months. Results Baseline characteristics were well-matched. At six months, both groups demonstrated significant functional improvement, with no statistically significant difference in final CMS (conservative: 75.7 ± 5.9 vs. surgical: 75.0 ± 6.7; p=0.723). The conservative group demonstrated a significant early functional advantage at 1 month (p<0.001) due to the avoidance of postoperative immobilization. While the surgical group achieved statistically lower absolute pain scores at 6 months (p=0.007), the mean difference (0.40 points) did not exceed the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID). Conclusion Structured conservative management yields short-term functional outcomes equivalent to arthroscopic repair for symptomatic partial-thickness supraspinatus tears, with the added benefit of faster early recovery. These findings support conservative care as a robust first-line strategy. Limitations include the non-randomized design and short-term follow-up, necessitating future longitudinal research to assess tear progression.

CureusVol. 18(1)
Government Medical College (IN), Indus Hospital (PK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.