Comparison of Three‐Dimensional Accuracy Between Digital and Conventional Definitive Impressions of Edentulous Arches: A Clinical Study

Within the limitations of this clinical study, which included edentulous ridges with minimal to moderate bone loss (Cawood and Howell Class III), 3D-printed and acrylic tray-based conventional definitive impressions demonstrated comparable dimensional accuracy to intraoral scanning, showing no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences between techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Science Reports
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.71775
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Three‐Dimensional Accuracy Between Digital and Conventional Definitive Impressions of Edentulous Arches: A Clinical Study

Sareh Habibzadeh, Wasan Abdulsamad Rahman, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Hassan Azangoo Khiavi
Health Science Reports
Dental materials and restorations
article

Comparison of Three‐Dimensional Accuracy Between Digital and Conventional Definitive Impressions of Edentulous Arches: A Clinical Study

Sareh Habibzadeh, Wasan Abdulsamad Rahman, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Hassan Azangoo Khiavi
article en

Abstract

Within the limitations of this clinical study, which included edentulous ridges with minimal to moderate bone loss (Cawood and Howell Class III), 3D-printed and acrylic tray-based conventional definitive impressions demonstrated comparable dimensional accuracy to intraoral scanning, showing no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences between techniques.

Health Science ReportsVol. 9(2)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.