A Tale of Two Programs? Stigma and Administrative Burdens in CHIP and Medicaid

ABSTRACT One contributing factor to undersubscriptions is administrative burdens. To explore whether program stigma affects attitudes about administrative burdens, a survey ( N = 2204) was fielded to assess differences in attitudes about seven policies decreasing administrative burdens and two policies increasing administrative burdens. The survey contained an experiment that assigned respondents to either questions about the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) or Medicaid. Most burden reductions were supported by a majority of respondents while attitudes about premiums and co‐payments were mixed. Only limited differences were identified between CHIP and Medicaid across all respondents and various important subgroups. Moreover, analyses found consistent differences across respondents within each program based on ideology, racial resentment, and program connection. However, the latter played a more limited role in CHIP. Given the limited findings here, policymakers may consider seeking efficiency gains by fully integrating Medicaid and CHIP programs in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Medical & Health Policy
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.70063
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Tale of Two Programs? Stigma and Administrative Burdens in CHIP and Medicaid

Simon F. Haeder
World Medical & Health Policy
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

A Tale of Two Programs? Stigma and Administrative Burdens in CHIP and Medicaid

Simon F. Haeder
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT One contributing factor to undersubscriptions is administrative burdens. To explore whether program stigma affects attitudes about administrative burdens, a survey ( N = 2204) was fielded to assess differences in attitudes about seven policies decreasing administrative burdens and two policies increasing administrative burdens. The survey contained an experiment that assigned respondents to either questions about the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) or Medicaid. Most burden reductions were supported by a majority of respondents while attitudes about premiums and co‐payments were mixed. Only limited differences were identified between CHIP and Medicaid across all respondents and various important subgroups. Moreover, analyses found consistent differences across respondents within each program based on ideology, racial resentment, and program connection. However, the latter played a more limited role in CHIP. Given the limited findings here, policymakers may consider seeking efficiency gains by fully integrating Medicaid and CHIP programs in the future.

World Medical & Health PolicyVol. 18(1)
The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.