Hierarchical Distribution of Reward Representation in the Cortical and Hippocampal Regions

Dopaminergic inputs to various brain regions, such as the striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala, play a critical role in processing reward acquisition information. While reward-related activity is also observed more broadly in motor, parietal, and hippocampal regions, the functional significance and potential hierarchy of reward-related representation across these latter areas remain unclear. We investigated this by quantifying neural predictive power using machine learning. Specifically, neural activity was examined in six brain areas-the primary and secondary motor cortices (M1 and M2), posterior parietal cortex (PPC), dorsal and ventral CA1 (dCA1 and vCA1), and lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC)-in male rats performing a self-initiated left-right choice task. Machine learning models classified rewarded versus nonrewarded trials based on neuronal firing properties significantly above chance for all regions. Crucially, classification revealed a clear performance gradient, forming a functional hierarchy: models using hippocampal data (dCA1 and vCA1) performed best, followed by LEC and PPC, with M1 and M2 performing lowest. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed a qualitative transformation in coding strategies along this hierarchy: while neocortical regions relied on subtle, distributed high-order statistics, the hippocampus utilized precise, categorical representations. At this apex, distinct strategies emerged: dCA1 primarily utilized temporally precise post-reward spike distributions with transient increase of response, while vCA1 integrated both spike timing and firing rate changes with suppressive response. These findings provide quantitative evidence for a functionally hierarchical and qualitative evolution of reward-related representation, highlighting distinct roles of dCA1 and vCA1 in encoding reward-related events to potentially guide future behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eNeuro
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0256-25.2026
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hierarchical Distribution of Reward Representation in the Cortical and Hippocampal Regions

Yoshikazu Isomura, Shogo Soma, Yui Mimura, Masahiro Okamoto
eNeuro
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Hierarchical Distribution of Reward Representation in the Cortical and Hippocampal Regions

Yoshikazu Isomura, Shogo Soma, Yui Mimura, Masahiro Okamoto
article en

Abstract

Dopaminergic inputs to various brain regions, such as the striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala, play a critical role in processing reward acquisition information. While reward-related activity is also observed more broadly in motor, parietal, and hippocampal regions, the functional significance and potential hierarchy of reward-related representation across these latter areas remain unclear. We investigated this by quantifying neural predictive power using machine learning. Specifically, neural activity was examined in six brain areas-the primary and secondary motor cortices (M1 and M2), posterior parietal cortex (PPC), dorsal and ventral CA1 (dCA1 and vCA1), and lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC)-in male rats performing a self-initiated left-right choice task. Machine learning models classified rewarded versus nonrewarded trials based on neuronal firing properties significantly above chance for all regions. Crucially, classification revealed a clear performance gradient, forming a functional hierarchy: models using hippocampal data (dCA1 and vCA1) performed best, followed by LEC and PPC, with M1 and M2 performing lowest. Furthermore, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed a qualitative transformation in coding strategies along this hierarchy: while neocortical regions relied on subtle, distributed high-order statistics, the hippocampus utilized precise, categorical representations. At this apex, distinct strategies emerged: dCA1 primarily utilized temporally precise post-reward spike distributions with transient increase of response, while vCA1 integrated both spike timing and firing rate changes with suppressive response. These findings provide quantitative evidence for a functionally hierarchical and qualitative evolution of reward-related representation, highlighting distinct roles of dCA1 and vCA1 in encoding reward-related events to potentially guide future behavior.

eNeuroVol. 13(2)
Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP), Fukushima Medical University (JP), Tamagawa University (JP), Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (JP)
Senri Life Science Foundation, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.