Exploring anatomical similarity in zero-shot learning for bone abnormality detection

Deep learning models for musculoskeletal imaging often require large, annotated datasets per anatomical region. In this study we explicitly treat abnormality detection (normal vs. abnormal) on MURA (which does not provide fracture-only labels) and ask whether anatomical similarity enables zero-shot (out-of-domain) transfer-training on one body part and evaluating on unseen parts without target data access. Using study-level aggregation and Wilson 95% confidence intervals, we quantify cross-part transfer as a function of anatomical proximity. We also include a small, labeled replication subset with a second backbone to verify that observed trends are not architecture-specific. Results show higher accuracy when source and target are anatomically similar. These findings bound what can be achieved without semantic side information or target adaptation and motivate anatomy-aware data selection for scalable deployment in data-limited settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37516-9
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring anatomical similarity in zero-shot learning for bone abnormality detection

Asim Khogeer, Khaled Shaban, Mohammed Kutbi
Scientific Reports
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Exploring anatomical similarity in zero-shot learning for bone abnormality detection

Asim Khogeer, Khaled Shaban, Mohammed Kutbi
article en

Abstract

Deep learning models for musculoskeletal imaging often require large, annotated datasets per anatomical region. In this study we explicitly treat abnormality detection (normal vs. abnormal) on MURA (which does not provide fracture-only labels) and ask whether anatomical similarity enables zero-shot (out-of-domain) transfer-training on one body part and evaluating on unseen parts without target data access. Using study-level aggregation and Wilson 95% confidence intervals, we quantify cross-part transfer as a function of anatomical proximity. We also include a small, labeled replication subset with a second backbone to verify that observed trends are not architecture-specific. Results show higher accuracy when source and target are anatomically similar. These findings bound what can be achieved without semantic side information or target adaptation and motivate anatomy-aware data selection for scalable deployment in data-limited settings.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Saudi Electronic University (SA), Ministry of Health (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.