Modelling Tools for Engineering-Level Planning of Energy Communities: A Review

Abstract Energy communities (EnCs) are emerging as a key mechanism for integrating distributed renewable energy resources and enhancing demand-side flexibility. Selecting appropriate modelling tools is critical for engineering-level planning of EnCs, including technology sizing and operational strategies. The paper combines a review of recent studies with a comparative analysis of selected modelling tools, outlining their capabilities, strengths, and limitations, with a focus on technical capabilities and usability. The findings reveal a growing availability of comprehensive open-source modelling tools, which are well-suited for advanced engineering-level planning of EnCs but require programming skills and expertise in energy system modelling. In contrast, commercial tools offer higher usability and are better suited for feasibility studies. Future development is expected to enhance their representation of demand-side flexibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/lpts-2026-0006
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling Tools for Engineering-Level Planning of Energy Communities: A Review

A. Mutule, A. Gavrilovs, I. Antoskova
Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

Modelling Tools for Engineering-Level Planning of Energy Communities: A Review

A. Mutule, A. Gavrilovs, I. Antoskova
article en

Abstract

Abstract Energy communities (EnCs) are emerging as a key mechanism for integrating distributed renewable energy resources and enhancing demand-side flexibility. Selecting appropriate modelling tools is critical for engineering-level planning of EnCs, including technology sizing and operational strategies. The paper combines a review of recent studies with a comparative analysis of selected modelling tools, outlining their capabilities, strengths, and limitations, with a focus on technical capabilities and usability. The findings reveal a growing availability of comprehensive open-source modelling tools, which are well-suited for advanced engineering-level planning of EnCs but require programming skills and expertise in energy system modelling. In contrast, commercial tools offer higher usability and are better suited for feasibility studies. Future development is expected to enhance their representation of demand-side flexibility.

Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical SciencesVol. 63(1)
Institute of Electronics and Computer Science (LV)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modelling Tools for Engineering-Level Planning of Energy Communities: A Review — A. Mutule, A. Gavrilovs, et al. · Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS