Sensitivity comparison of Rydberg atom-based radio frequency electric field detection: Ionization current versus optical readout

We investigate a technique for detecting radio frequency (RF) electric fields in a cesium (Cs) vapor cell at room temperature by collecting charges from ionized Rydberg atoms and compare its performance with the established method of electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT). By applying a known RF field, we measure the response from both the electrical (ionization current-based) and optical (EIT-based) readouts. The ionization current-based method yields a sensitivity of 22 μ V m−1 Hz−1/2, while the EIT-based method achieves 3.7 μ V m−1 Hz−1/2. The sensitivity of the ionization current-based method is limited by the 2.2 k Ω resistance between the collection electrodes, attributed to a thin Cs film on the inner surfaces of the vapor cell. Controlling or eliminating the Cs layer can significantly improve the sensitivity of this ionization approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AVS Quantum Science
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0303207
Primary Topic
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity comparison of Rydberg atom-based radio frequency electric field detection: Ionization current versus optical readout

Dixith Manchaiah, Noah Schlossberger, Dangka Shylla, Nikunjkumar Prajapati et al.
AVS Quantum Science
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
article

Sensitivity comparison of Rydberg atom-based radio frequency electric field detection: Ionization current versus optical readout

Dixith Manchaiah, Noah Schlossberger, Dangka Shylla, Nikunjkumar Prajapati, Rajavardhan Talashila, Samuel Berweger, Christopher L. Holloway, Matthew T. Simons, Adil Meraki, Alexandra Artusio-Glimpse
article en

Abstract

We investigate a technique for detecting radio frequency (RF) electric fields in a cesium (Cs) vapor cell at room temperature by collecting charges from ionized Rydberg atoms and compare its performance with the established method of electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT). By applying a known RF field, we measure the response from both the electrical (ionization current-based) and optical (EIT-based) readouts. The ionization current-based method yields a sensitivity of 22 μ V m−1 Hz−1/2, while the EIT-based method achieves 3.7 μ V m−1 Hz−1/2. The sensitivity of the ionization current-based method is limited by the 2.2 k Ω resistance between the collection electrodes, attributed to a thin Cs film on the inner surfaces of the vapor cell. Controlling or eliminating the Cs layer can significantly improve the sensitivity of this ionization approach.

AVS Quantum ScienceVol. 8(1)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Colorado System (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sensitivity comparison of Rydberg atom-based radio frequency electric field detection: Ionization current versus optical readout — Dixith Manchaiah, Noah Schlossberger, et al. · AVS Quantum Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS