“Disconnected, Interrupted, Tied in Knots”: Communicative Capture in U.S. Prisons

Abstract Extensive research shows how the state deprives captives of social interaction across prison walls as a form of punishment. However, little is known about the function of expanded communication access through reforms such as reduced-cost phone calls and “free” digital tablets in U.S. prisons. Drawing on interviews with formerly imprisoned men and loved ones of currently imprisoned men in New York state prisons, this article argues that prisons do not solely deprive captives of communication: they simultaneously facilitate communication across walls as a form of social control—a process termed “communicative capture.” Through prison communication technologies such as phones, tablets, and letters, the state provides necessary, intimate connection while expanding control over the labor sustaining captives and their communities. Prisons carry out communicative capture through overlapping mechanisms of surveillance, resource extraction, and pacification, which interlock to regulate the labor of social reproduction. The findings reveal the contradictions of social reproduction in the context of imprisonment, where the state simultaneously restricts and facilitates life-saving communication to sustain captive populations and reproduce the prison regime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Problems
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spag002
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Disconnected, Interrupted, Tied in Knots”: Communicative Capture in U.S. Prisons

Jacob Hood
Social Problems
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

“Disconnected, Interrupted, Tied in Knots”: Communicative Capture in U.S. Prisons

Jacob Hood
article en

Abstract

Abstract Extensive research shows how the state deprives captives of social interaction across prison walls as a form of punishment. However, little is known about the function of expanded communication access through reforms such as reduced-cost phone calls and “free” digital tablets in U.S. prisons. Drawing on interviews with formerly imprisoned men and loved ones of currently imprisoned men in New York state prisons, this article argues that prisons do not solely deprive captives of communication: they simultaneously facilitate communication across walls as a form of social control—a process termed “communicative capture.” Through prison communication technologies such as phones, tablets, and letters, the state provides necessary, intimate connection while expanding control over the labor sustaining captives and their communities. Prisons carry out communicative capture through overlapping mechanisms of surveillance, resource extraction, and pacification, which interlock to regulate the labor of social reproduction. The findings reveal the contradictions of social reproduction in the context of imprisonment, where the state simultaneously restricts and facilitates life-saving communication to sustain captive populations and reproduce the prison regime.

Social Problems
New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.