Electrochemical Potentiostat Uncertainty and Traceability

Many electrochemical measurements use a potentiostat or galvanostat to apply and measure potentials and currents. While ubiquitous, the practical limitations on the accuracy of these devices and the uncertainty they can introduce into measurements are often unappreciated. This article serves as an introduction to instrumentation uncertainty in electrochemistry with the aim of orienting electrochemists to the likely magnitude of error introduced by common commercially available instrumentation. There is currently no standardized method for determining whether instruments meet their expected specifications, so a method for traceably testing that a potentiostat meets a required level of accuracy is presented. The results of example tests on four brands of potentiostats illustrate the method and highlight the limitations of commonly used devices. Practically, it was found that at voltages ≤1.5 V, the devices studied introduced an expanded (k = 2) uncertainty of <2 mV between 0.1 μA and 100 mA and an uncertainty on current of <1 % when used within specifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS electrochemistry.
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acselectrochem.5c00220
Primary Topic
Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electrochemical Potentiostat Uncertainty and Traceability

Toby Clark, Thomas Wakelin, Ali Al-Sikab, Billie Sherin et al.
ACS electrochemistry.
Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
article

Electrochemical Potentiostat Uncertainty and Traceability

Toby Clark, Thomas Wakelin, Ali Al-Sikab, Billie Sherin, Andrew J. Wain, Graham Smith, Tharini Herath Pathiranage
article en

Abstract

Many electrochemical measurements use a potentiostat or galvanostat to apply and measure potentials and currents. While ubiquitous, the practical limitations on the accuracy of these devices and the uncertainty they can introduce into measurements are often unappreciated. This article serves as an introduction to instrumentation uncertainty in electrochemistry with the aim of orienting electrochemists to the likely magnitude of error introduced by common commercially available instrumentation. There is currently no standardized method for determining whether instruments meet their expected specifications, so a method for traceably testing that a potentiostat meets a required level of accuracy is presented. The results of example tests on four brands of potentiostats illustrate the method and highlight the limitations of commonly used devices. Practically, it was found that at voltages ≤1.5 V, the devices studied introduced an expanded (k = 2) uncertainty of <2 mV between 0.1 μA and 100 mA and an uncertainty on current of <1 % when used within specifications.

ACS electrochemistry.Vol. 2(2)
National Physical Laboratory (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.