A situational analysis of the adoption of oncology, inflammation, and supportive care biosimilars in the United States

Existing research primarily addresses clinical equivalence to reference biologics and safety of switching, with a paucity in data demonstrating broader patient population benefits of biosimilars. Cost savings from biosimilars are described, but there is a lack of evidence that these savings translate into improved access or earlier use of biologics, or whether budgetary reallocations enable access to other innovative treatments. While biosimilars are expected to reduce spending and expand treatment options, data on their extended stability and real-world outcomes are scarce. In conclusion, biosimilars offer potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve access to biologic therapies. Further research is needed to fully establish their holistic benefits across patient populations. This would enable a better understanding of how biosimilar adoption influences real-world treatment access, clinical and system-wide outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2026.2621021
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A situational analysis of the adoption of oncology, inflammation, and supportive care biosimilars in the United States

Mark Latymer, Josephine Kim, Ann Wicker, Joshua A. Roth et al.
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

A situational analysis of the adoption of oncology, inflammation, and supportive care biosimilars in the United States

Mark Latymer, Josephine Kim, Ann Wicker, Joshua A. Roth, Vatche Demirjian, Bhavesh Shah
article en

Abstract

Existing research primarily addresses clinical equivalence to reference biologics and safety of switching, with a paucity in data demonstrating broader patient population benefits of biosimilars. Cost savings from biosimilars are described, but there is a lack of evidence that these savings translate into improved access or earlier use of biologics, or whether budgetary reallocations enable access to other innovative treatments. While biosimilars are expected to reduce spending and expand treatment options, data on their extended stability and real-world outcomes are scarce. In conclusion, biosimilars offer potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve access to biologic therapies. Further research is needed to fully establish their holistic benefits across patient populations. This would enable a better understanding of how biosimilar adoption influences real-world treatment access, clinical and system-wide outcomes.

Expert Opinion on Biological TherapyVol. 26(1)
Boston Medical Center (US), Pfizer (United States) (US), University of Washington (US), Akebia Therapeutics (United States) (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.