Gross Negligence in Bank Payments Law

Abstract The law’s allocation of responsibility for disputed bank payments is important not only for banks and customers, but also, given the volume and value of payments, for the economy more broadly. This article examines loss allocation under common law, EU–UK regulation and the UK’s ‘world-first’ scheme for ‘authorised push payment’ frauds, showing that the gross negligence standard of customer conduct is a common feature. Indeed, this ‘slippery concept’ sits at critical junctures, providing, in practice, the most relevant limitation to a bank’s liability to refund payments. The article analyses what this standard means in English common law and in its regulatory contexts, and highlights the important connection between the two. It then draws upon decisions by the UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service, amongst other sources, to explore how evaluating bank customer conduct works in practice, concluding that it is time for regulators to rethink the status quo.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqag002
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gross Negligence in Bank Payments Law

Jo Braithwaite
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
European and International Contract Law
article

Gross Negligence in Bank Payments Law

Jo Braithwaite
article en

Abstract

Abstract The law’s allocation of responsibility for disputed bank payments is important not only for banks and customers, but also, given the volume and value of payments, for the economy more broadly. This article examines loss allocation under common law, EU–UK regulation and the UK’s ‘world-first’ scheme for ‘authorised push payment’ frauds, showing that the gross negligence standard of customer conduct is a common feature. Indeed, this ‘slippery concept’ sits at critical junctures, providing, in practice, the most relevant limitation to a bank’s liability to refund payments. The article analyses what this standard means in English common law and in its regulatory contexts, and highlights the important connection between the two. It then draws upon decisions by the UK’s Financial Ombudsman Service, amongst other sources, to explore how evaluating bank customer conduct works in practice, concluding that it is time for regulators to rethink the status quo.

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.