Anthropometric Characteristics of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients by Menopausal Status: Evidence from the Population-Based Multicentric Study—MCC-Spain

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study aimed to analyze the relationship between various anthropometric measurements (Body Mass Index (BMI), Clínica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator (CUNBAE), hip and waist circumference (WC), weight, and height) and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) according to menopausal status. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 113 TNBC cases and 226 matched controls from the MCC-Spain study were included. Controls were matched by age, educational level, family history, and province. Conditional logistic regression models, stratified by menopausal status, were used to estimate adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) and their 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CIs) for the association between anthropometric measures and TNBC risk. <b>Results</b>: A divergent non-significant trend was observed: compared to their respective controls, premenopausal cases tended to have lower mean anthropometric measurements (except height), while postmenopausal cases showed higher means. No statistically significant associations were observed for individual measures derived from logistic regressions. However, when comparing women with normal BMI and normal WC (the reference group), a non-significant association of risk was found in those premenopausal women who were centrally obese (normal weight/high WC) (aOR = 1.79; 95% CI = 0.17-18.29), but the combination of overweight and a large WC showed an aOR of 0.22 (95% CI = 0.03-1.68) before menopause. In contrast, the combination of overweight and a high WC showed a statistically significant adjusted OR of 3.28 in postmenopausal women (95% CI = 1.10-9.81). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings suggest that the relationship between adiposity and TNBC is inverse in premenopausal women and direct in postmenopausal women, highlighting the importance of considering both body fat distribution and menopausal status when evaluating TNBC. However, our findings are limited by low statistical power, which may have led to a lack of statistical significance, and there is a need for larger, collaborative studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14030321
Primary Topic
Cancer Risks and Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anthropometric Characteristics of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients by Menopausal Status: Evidence from the Population-Based Multicentric Study—MCC-Spain

Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos, Gemma Castaño-Vinyals, Vicente Martín-Sánchez, Sonia del Barco et al.
Healthcare
Cancer Risks and Factors
article

Anthropometric Characteristics of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients by Menopausal Status: Evidence from the Population-Based Multicentric Study—MCC-Spain

Trinidad Dierssen-Sotos, Gemma Castaño-Vinyals, Vicente Martín-Sánchez, Sonia del Barco, Marina Pollán, Ana Molina-Barceló, Beatriz Pérez-Gómez, Virginia Lope, Lorena Botella-Juan, Guillermo Fernández-Tardón, Marina Muñoz-Pérez, Mireia Obón-Santacana, Pilar Amiano, Manolis Kogevinas, Facundo Vitelli-Storelli, Marcela Guevara, Juan Alguacil, Antonio José Molina, María Rubín-García
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study aimed to analyze the relationship between various anthropometric measurements (Body Mass Index (BMI), Clínica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator (CUNBAE), hip and waist circumference (WC), weight, and height) and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) according to menopausal status. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 113 TNBC cases and 226 matched controls from the MCC-Spain study were included. Controls were matched by age, educational level, family history, and province. Conditional logistic regression models, stratified by menopausal status, were used to estimate adjusted Odds Ratios (aORs) and their 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CIs) for the association between anthropometric measures and TNBC risk. <b>Results</b>: A divergent non-significant trend was observed: compared to their respective controls, premenopausal cases tended to have lower mean anthropometric measurements (except height), while postmenopausal cases showed higher means. No statistically significant associations were observed for individual measures derived from logistic regressions. However, when comparing women with normal BMI and normal WC (the reference group), a non-significant association of risk was found in those premenopausal women who were centrally obese (normal weight/high WC) (aOR = 1.79; 95% CI = 0.17-18.29), but the combination of overweight and a large WC showed an aOR of 0.22 (95% CI = 0.03-1.68) before menopause. In contrast, the combination of overweight and a high WC showed a statistically significant adjusted OR of 3.28 in postmenopausal women (95% CI = 1.10-9.81). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings suggest that the relationship between adiposity and TNBC is inverse in premenopausal women and direct in postmenopausal women, highlighting the importance of considering both body fat distribution and menopausal status when evaluating TNBC. However, our findings are limited by low statistical power, which may have led to a lack of statistical significance, and there is a need for larger, collaborative studies.

HealthcareVol. 14(3)
Universitat Jaume I (ES), Universidad de Cantabria (ES), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Catalan Institute for Water Research (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra (ES), Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge (ES), Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (ES), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES), Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (ES), Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona (ES), Policlínica Gipuzkoa (ES), Hospital Del Mar (ES), Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (ES), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES), Hospital del Mar Research Institute (ES), Universidad de Huelva (ES), Universidad de León (ES)
European Commission, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Generalitat Valenciana, Universidad de Oviedo, Junta de Andalucía, Junta de Castilla y León, Fundación Marqués de Valdecilla, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Departament d'Universitats, Recerca i Societat de la Informació
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Cancer Risks and Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.