Employer Contestations and Access to Unemployment Insurance: Implications for Benefit Receipt, Material Hardship, and Administrative Burden

Employers have a direct financial interest in the federal-state unemployment insurance (UI) system. Employer taxes, which generally increase when an employer’s former employee receives benefits, usually fund UI. Employers may contest workers’ eligibility, aided by a growing claims-management industry. Yet scholars know little about this practice’s relationship with benefit receipt, in part because we lack publicly available administrative data. To fill this gap, we draw from an original, nationally representative survey of US workers who experienced unemployment between 2019 and 2024. In our national sample, a quarter of jobless workers report contestation—a figure higher than past studies focused on single states. Yet more than a third of these workers go on to claim benefits successfully, suggesting that employers frequently contest likely eligible claims. Further, employers more often contest less-educated workers’ claims, which may help explain disparities in access to UI by educational attainment. Workers who report contestations are less likely to claim benefits and report higher rates of material hardship and administrative burden. Our analysis provides a fuller picture of employers’ role in UI administration and suggests that policy makers should consider the trade-offs associated with the employer role in UI benefit administration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Service Review
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/739410
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Employer Contestations and Access to Unemployment Insurance: Implications for Benefit Receipt, Material Hardship, and Administrative Burden

Alix Gould-Werth, Alexander Hertel-Fernandez
Social Service Review
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
article

Employer Contestations and Access to Unemployment Insurance: Implications for Benefit Receipt, Material Hardship, and Administrative Burden

Alix Gould-Werth, Alexander Hertel-Fernandez
article en

Abstract

Employers have a direct financial interest in the federal-state unemployment insurance (UI) system. Employer taxes, which generally increase when an employer’s former employee receives benefits, usually fund UI. Employers may contest workers’ eligibility, aided by a growing claims-management industry. Yet scholars know little about this practice’s relationship with benefit receipt, in part because we lack publicly available administrative data. To fill this gap, we draw from an original, nationally representative survey of US workers who experienced unemployment between 2019 and 2024. In our national sample, a quarter of jobless workers report contestation—a figure higher than past studies focused on single states. Yet more than a third of these workers go on to claim benefits successfully, suggesting that employers frequently contest likely eligible claims. Further, employers more often contest less-educated workers’ claims, which may help explain disparities in access to UI by educational attainment. Workers who report contestations are less likely to claim benefits and report higher rates of material hardship and administrative burden. Our analysis provides a fuller picture of employers’ role in UI administration and suggests that policy makers should consider the trade-offs associated with the employer role in UI benefit administration.

Social Service ReviewVol. 100(1)
Columbia University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.