A viewpoint on trust, ethics, and transparency in AI-driven learning organizations

Purpose This viewpoint examines the critical role of trust, ethics and transparency in AI-driven learning organizations, exploring how algorithmic opacity and ethical ambiguity create barriers to organizational learning effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on social cognition theory and organizational learning frameworks, this conceptual analysis illustrates how trust erosion in AI-mediated environments creates a cyclical pattern of resistance behavior that impedes knowledge sharing and collaborative learning processes. Findings AI systems’ lack of transparency generates interpretive uncertainty among employees, leading to skepticism, resistance behavior and the formation of negative cognitive schemas that hinder organizational learning cycles. Trust deficits compound these effects through reduced participation in AI-enabled training programs. Research limitations/implications As a conceptual viewpoint, this paper lacks empirical data, future studies (longitudinal surveys or field experiments manipulating transparency) should test the proposed cycle and cultural boundary conditions. Practical implications Organizations must establish transparent AI governance frameworks and ethical oversight mechanisms to build employee trust and maximize the effectiveness of AI-driven learning initiatives. Social implications Ethical AI implementation in learning organizations contributes to broader societal goals of responsible technology adoption and sustainable institutional development and can improve fairness in upskilling access. Originality/value This work uniquely integrates trust theory with AI governance frameworks to demonstrate how ethical transparency gaps create psychosocial barriers to learning, offering a novel perspective on human-AI interaction in organizational contexts. Unlike many AI-ethics models that prioritize technical compliance, this viewpoint emphasizes psychological pathways from opacity to employee learning behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo-08-2025-0311
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A viewpoint on trust, ethics, and transparency in AI-driven learning organizations

Vidya Bhegade
Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A viewpoint on trust, ethics, and transparency in AI-driven learning organizations

Vidya Bhegade
article en

Abstract

Purpose This viewpoint examines the critical role of trust, ethics and transparency in AI-driven learning organizations, exploring how algorithmic opacity and ethical ambiguity create barriers to organizational learning effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on social cognition theory and organizational learning frameworks, this conceptual analysis illustrates how trust erosion in AI-mediated environments creates a cyclical pattern of resistance behavior that impedes knowledge sharing and collaborative learning processes. Findings AI systems’ lack of transparency generates interpretive uncertainty among employees, leading to skepticism, resistance behavior and the formation of negative cognitive schemas that hinder organizational learning cycles. Trust deficits compound these effects through reduced participation in AI-enabled training programs. Research limitations/implications As a conceptual viewpoint, this paper lacks empirical data, future studies (longitudinal surveys or field experiments manipulating transparency) should test the proposed cycle and cultural boundary conditions. Practical implications Organizations must establish transparent AI governance frameworks and ethical oversight mechanisms to build employee trust and maximize the effectiveness of AI-driven learning initiatives. Social implications Ethical AI implementation in learning organizations contributes to broader societal goals of responsible technology adoption and sustainable institutional development and can improve fairness in upskilling access. Originality/value This work uniquely integrates trust theory with AI governance frameworks to demonstrate how ethical transparency gaps create psychosocial barriers to learning, offering a novel perspective on human-AI interaction in organizational contexts. Unlike many AI-ethics models that prioritize technical compliance, this viewpoint emphasizes psychological pathways from opacity to employee learning behavior.

Development in Learning Organizations An International JournalVol. 40(2)
Symbiosis International University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.