Hemodynamic effects of ramosetron during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil: a randomized controlled trial

Ramosetron, a 5-HT 3 receptor antagonist, attenuates hypotension during spinal anesthesia, but its hemodynamic effects during total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) remain unclear.This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated ramosetron's hemodynamic effects during propofol-remifentanil TIVA induction.A total of 183 patients (ASA I-II, aged 20-65 years) undergoing elective surgery were randomized to receive intravenous normal saline (control, n=62), ramosetron 0.3 mg (n=61), or ramosetron 0.6 mg (n=60) before TIVA induction.Hemodynamic parameters were measured serially from baseline to post-intubation.The primary endpoint was hemodynamic changes immediately before intubation.At the primary endpoint, no significant differences were observed among groups in changes in systolic blood pressure (p=0.190),diastolic blood pressure (p=0.107),mean arterial pressure (p=0.344), or heart rate (p=0.134).Although isolated statistically significant differences were observed post-intubation in systolic and mean arterial pressure changes (p=0.030,p=0.040), repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant timegroup interaction (p>0.4).The incidence of hemodynamic adverse events was low and comparable among groups.Ramosetron 0.3 mg or 0.6 mg did not significantly affect hemodynamic changes during propofol-remifentanil TIVA induction.Ramosetron can be safely used for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis without compromising hemodynamic stability.However, evidence supporting its use primarily for blood pressure stabilization during TIVA is insufficient, as hemodynamic benefits observed in spinal anesthesia do not translate to TIVA settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Biological Science and Engineering
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30579/mbse.2026.9.1.8
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hemodynamic effects of ramosetron during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil: a randomized controlled trial

Sang Hun Kim, Yoon Ji Choi
Medical Biological Science and Engineering
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Hemodynamic effects of ramosetron during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil: a randomized controlled trial

Sang Hun Kim, Yoon Ji Choi
article en

Abstract

Ramosetron, a 5-HT 3 receptor antagonist, attenuates hypotension during spinal anesthesia, but its hemodynamic effects during total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) remain unclear.This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated ramosetron's hemodynamic effects during propofol-remifentanil TIVA induction.A total of 183 patients (ASA I-II, aged 20-65 years) undergoing elective surgery were randomized to receive intravenous normal saline (control, n=62), ramosetron 0.3 mg (n=61), or ramosetron 0.6 mg (n=60) before TIVA induction.Hemodynamic parameters were measured serially from baseline to post-intubation.The primary endpoint was hemodynamic changes immediately before intubation.At the primary endpoint, no significant differences were observed among groups in changes in systolic blood pressure (p=0.190),diastolic blood pressure (p=0.107),mean arterial pressure (p=0.344), or heart rate (p=0.134).Although isolated statistically significant differences were observed post-intubation in systolic and mean arterial pressure changes (p=0.030,p=0.040), repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant timegroup interaction (p>0.4).The incidence of hemodynamic adverse events was low and comparable among groups.Ramosetron 0.3 mg or 0.6 mg did not significantly affect hemodynamic changes during propofol-remifentanil TIVA induction.Ramosetron can be safely used for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis without compromising hemodynamic stability.However, evidence supporting its use primarily for blood pressure stabilization during TIVA is insufficient, as hemodynamic benefits observed in spinal anesthesia do not translate to TIVA settings.

Medical Biological Science and EngineeringVol. 9(1)
Chosun University (KR), Korea University (KR), Chosun University Hospital (KR)
Chosun University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.