When personal names are mentioned in conversations

Abstract Sacks and Schegloff ( 1979 ; Schegloff 1996 ) identify a preference for recognitional references to persons over non-recognitional forms of references. Furthermore, they identify as a subsidiary preference that, among recognitional forms, personal names are preferred over recognitional descriptors. However, as Sacks and Schegloff indicate, these preferences in no way limit the use of names to conclusively recognizable persons, nor do they even inhibit references to persons by name when recognition is not at all practicable. In this report, we first describe those practices that manage (and thereby exhibit) levels of confidence regarding the recognizability of personal names. We then examine several environments in which personal names are employed in introducing persons as previously unknown to recipients, and we describe one family of practices for doing so. Finally, we identify storytelling as a principal environment in which personal names are used, and we describe where unknown persons are introduced by storytellers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25001.whi
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When personal names are mentioned in conversations

Gene H. Lerner, Kevin A. Whitehead
Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

When personal names are mentioned in conversations

Gene H. Lerner, Kevin A. Whitehead
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sacks and Schegloff ( 1979 ; Schegloff 1996 ) identify a preference for recognitional references to persons over non-recognitional forms of references. Furthermore, they identify as a subsidiary preference that, among recognitional forms, personal names are preferred over recognitional descriptors. However, as Sacks and Schegloff indicate, these preferences in no way limit the use of names to conclusively recognizable persons, nor do they even inhibit references to persons by name when recognition is not at all practicable. In this report, we first describe those practices that manage (and thereby exhibit) levels of confidence regarding the recognizability of personal names. We then examine several environments in which personal names are employed in introducing persons as previously unknown to recipients, and we describe one family of practices for doing so. Finally, we identify storytelling as a principal environment in which personal names are used, and we describe where unknown persons are introduced by storytellers.

Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When personal names are mentioned in conversations — Gene H. Lerner, Kevin A. Whitehead · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS