Loss aversion and genetic variants influence food choice: Implications for healthier dietary decisions

Loss aversion, the cognitive bias favouring avoiding losses over equivalent gains, has been linked to dietary choices. Independently, genetic variation affecting dopaminergic function has been associated with loss aversion. This study examined the influence of loss aversion and genetic variation on food choices based on perceived healthiness. This is a randomised cross-over study. Participants completed two food choice tasks, scale-up (adding toppings) and scale-down (removing/keeping toppings). Participants rated the perceived healthiness of each food item. Loss aversion was objectively assessed using a small-stake gambling task, classifying individuals as highly (LA<sub>H</sub>) or lowly (LA<sub>L</sub>) loss averse. Buccal samples were collected for genetic analysis, and all data were obtained via Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) Online Surveys. Both LA<sub>H</sub> and LA<sub>L</sub> participants kept more toppings than they added. LA<sub>H</sub> participants kept more healthy and unhealthy toppings, whereas LA<sub>L</sub> kept only more healthy toppings than they added. Genetic variation had an opposing effect in the LA<sub>H</sub> and LA<sub>L</sub> groups, leading to the differences in the addition of total toppings and unhealthy toppings (scale up) and removal of unhealthy toppings (scale down). Therefore, high loss aversion combined with genetic predispositions to reduced dopamine activity may promote greater food retention, irrespective of perceived healthiness. In contrast, genetic variants and lower loss aversion are associated with more selective, health-oriented choices. Findings warrant further investigation in larger cohorts to elucidate underlying mechanisms and inform personalised dietary interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition and Health
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060251413561
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Loss aversion and genetic variants influence food choice: Implications for healthier dietary decisions

Emily Swift, Catherine Anna-Marie Graham, Shincy Sivadasan, Joycey Manju Varkey et al.
Nutrition and Health
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

Loss aversion and genetic variants influence food choice: Implications for healthier dietary decisions

Emily Swift, Catherine Anna-Marie Graham, Shincy Sivadasan, Joycey Manju Varkey, Alexandra King, Sarah Kennedy, Yiannis Mavrommatis, Leta Pilic
article en

Abstract

Loss aversion, the cognitive bias favouring avoiding losses over equivalent gains, has been linked to dietary choices. Independently, genetic variation affecting dopaminergic function has been associated with loss aversion. This study examined the influence of loss aversion and genetic variation on food choices based on perceived healthiness. This is a randomised cross-over study. Participants completed two food choice tasks, scale-up (adding toppings) and scale-down (removing/keeping toppings). Participants rated the perceived healthiness of each food item. Loss aversion was objectively assessed using a small-stake gambling task, classifying individuals as highly (LA<sub>H</sub>) or lowly (LA<sub>L</sub>) loss averse. Buccal samples were collected for genetic analysis, and all data were obtained via Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) Online Surveys. Both LA<sub>H</sub> and LA<sub>L</sub> participants kept more toppings than they added. LA<sub>H</sub> participants kept more healthy and unhealthy toppings, whereas LA<sub>L</sub> kept only more healthy toppings than they added. Genetic variation had an opposing effect in the LA<sub>H</sub> and LA<sub>L</sub> groups, leading to the differences in the addition of total toppings and unhealthy toppings (scale up) and removal of unhealthy toppings (scale down). Therefore, high loss aversion combined with genetic predispositions to reduced dopamine activity may promote greater food retention, irrespective of perceived healthiness. In contrast, genetic variants and lower loss aversion are associated with more selective, health-oriented choices. Findings warrant further investigation in larger cohorts to elucidate underlying mechanisms and inform personalised dietary interventions.

Nutrition and Health
St Mary's University Twickenham London (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), Ocean Power Technologies (United Kingdom) (GB), Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (CH)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.