Research Integrity Skills Assessment

As a researcher, one has the privilege to work freely, adding content and context to the knowledge base of the scientific community - and the society in general. This freedom comes with responsibility: The responsibility for self-control, accuracy, honesty, efficiency and objectivity. The scientific community has introduced rules of research integrity, which aim to preserve the freedom of research while at the same time prevent scientific misconduct. These rules should be understood as guidelines rather than actual statutory standards.The guidelines reflect the diversity of research and may vary considerably depending on the discipline and focus of the research performing organisation (RPO). Particularly in view of the increasing emphasis on interdisciplinary and international cooperation, the multitude of different guidelines and resources can seem confusing for both researchers and RPOs.This living document - the Research Integrity Skills (RISk) Assessment - is intended to provide researchers and RPOs alike with an overview of the most common guidelines and resources for Research Integrity. This makes it possible to evaluate the extent to which the respective RPO has implemented the most common guidelines and whether it provides the necessary infrastructure in terms of research integrity. Researchers themselves, but also newly appointed Research Integrity Officers and Ombudspersons can assess their knowledge of good research practice and gain some orientation. At the same time, the RISk Assessment is also intended to serve as a platform for making the important resources developed on research integrity findable and accessible at all times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18377287
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Integrity Skills Assessment

Michael Mende
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

Research Integrity Skills Assessment

Michael Mende
article en

Abstract

As a researcher, one has the privilege to work freely, adding content and context to the knowledge base of the scientific community - and the society in general. This freedom comes with responsibility: The responsibility for self-control, accuracy, honesty, efficiency and objectivity. The scientific community has introduced rules of research integrity, which aim to preserve the freedom of research while at the same time prevent scientific misconduct. These rules should be understood as guidelines rather than actual statutory standards.The guidelines reflect the diversity of research and may vary considerably depending on the discipline and focus of the research performing organisation (RPO). Particularly in view of the increasing emphasis on interdisciplinary and international cooperation, the multitude of different guidelines and resources can seem confusing for both researchers and RPOs.This living document - the Research Integrity Skills (RISk) Assessment - is intended to provide researchers and RPOs alike with an overview of the most common guidelines and resources for Research Integrity. This makes it possible to evaluate the extent to which the respective RPO has implemented the most common guidelines and whether it provides the necessary infrastructure in terms of research integrity. Researchers themselves, but also newly appointed Research Integrity Officers and Ombudspersons can assess their knowledge of good research practice and gain some orientation. At the same time, the RISk Assessment is also intended to serve as a platform for making the important resources developed on research integrity findable and accessible at all times.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior (DE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research Integrity Skills Assessment — Michael Mende · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS