Comparable Outcome Scores for Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair in Isolated and Combined Grade III Injuries, with Lower Rates of Complication Following Repair at 2-year Follow-up: A Systematic Review

To compare patient-reported outcomes and complications of medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair versus reconstruction in patients with grade III MCL injuries, and to report whether these were isolated or associated lesions, with minimum 2-year follow-up. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was conducted from database inception to August 2024 according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reporting outcomes and complications following repair or reconstruction of grade III MCL injuries with ≥2-year follow-up were included. Data on concomitant procedures were extracted to determine the frequency of isolated versus combined lesions. A total of 12 studies met the criteria, comprising 388 patients: 277 underwent MCL reconstruction and 111 underwent MCL repair. Mean follow-up was 37.6 months for reconstruction and 56.2 months for repair. The majority of injuries were COMBINED LESIONS: , with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction performed in 70.8% of reconstruction and 58.6% of repair cohorts. Postoperative IKDC scores ranged 54.3 to 89 for reconstruction and 79.1 to 88.8 for repair; Lysholm scores ranged 59.4 to 94.8 and 83.8 to 98.5, respectively. Complications occurred in 14.4% of reconstruction and 4.5% of repair patients, most commonly range of motion deficits. Reoperation rates were comparable (6.1% vs. 7.2%). Both reconstruction and repair for grade III MCL injuries yielded favorable outcomes at ≥2-year follow-up. MCL repair demonstrated slightly higher IKDC and Lysholm scores with fewer complications overall. Most cases involved COMBINED MCL AND ACL INJURIES: , highlighting the rarity of isolated grade III MCL lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: is level IV, systematic review of level II to IV studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Knee Surgery
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2778-8771
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparable Outcome Scores for Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair in Isolated and Combined Grade III Injuries, with Lower Rates of Complication Following Repair at 2-year Follow-up: A Systematic Review

Jorge Chahla, Benjamin Tyler Lack, Andrea M Javier, Derrick M. Knapik et al.
The Journal of Knee Surgery
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Comparable Outcome Scores for Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction and Repair in Isolated and Combined Grade III Injuries, with Lower Rates of Complication Following Repair at 2-year Follow-up: A Systematic Review

Jorge Chahla, Benjamin Tyler Lack, Andrea M Javier, Derrick M. Knapik, Colton C. Mowers, Justin T. Childers, Clayton W Nuelle, Garrett R. Jackson, Steven F DeFroda
article en

Abstract

To compare patient-reported outcomes and complications of medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair versus reconstruction in patients with grade III MCL injuries, and to report whether these were isolated or associated lesions, with minimum 2-year follow-up. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was conducted from database inception to August 2024 according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reporting outcomes and complications following repair or reconstruction of grade III MCL injuries with ≥2-year follow-up were included. Data on concomitant procedures were extracted to determine the frequency of isolated versus combined lesions. A total of 12 studies met the criteria, comprising 388 patients: 277 underwent MCL reconstruction and 111 underwent MCL repair. Mean follow-up was 37.6 months for reconstruction and 56.2 months for repair. The majority of injuries were COMBINED LESIONS: , with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction performed in 70.8% of reconstruction and 58.6% of repair cohorts. Postoperative IKDC scores ranged 54.3 to 89 for reconstruction and 79.1 to 88.8 for repair; Lysholm scores ranged 59.4 to 94.8 and 83.8 to 98.5, respectively. Complications occurred in 14.4% of reconstruction and 4.5% of repair patients, most commonly range of motion deficits. Reoperation rates were comparable (6.1% vs. 7.2%). Both reconstruction and repair for grade III MCL injuries yielded favorable outcomes at ≥2-year follow-up. MCL repair demonstrated slightly higher IKDC and Lysholm scores with fewer complications overall. Most cases involved COMBINED MCL AND ACL INJURIES: , highlighting the rarity of isolated grade III MCL lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: is level IV, systematic review of level II to IV studies.

The Journal of Knee Surgery
Rush University Medical Center (US), Florida International University (US), Jewish Hospital (US), Florida Atlantic University (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.