Beyond Hedging and Bandwagoning: Approaching Myanmar’s Engagement With External Powers Through the Lens of Diversification and Prudence (2016–2021)

Recent studies on Myanmar’s foreign relations during its democratic transition (2011–2021) focus on its relations vis-à-vis great powers through the lens of hedging and bandwagoning. This article puts forward diversification and prudence as alternative conceptual frameworks that foreground our analysis on small states’ agency and preferences in approaching Myanmar’s external engagement during the period of National League for Democracy (NLD) government. During the period, Myanmar diversified its relations with major regional and extra-regional powers such as, but not limited to, Japan, India and Russia in different issue areas (military, economic and ideational). In parallel, the NLD, or Daw Suu in particular, considered China to be an indispensable partner due to its geopolitical and strategic importance. Therefore, it pursued benefits from China that aligned with the government’s strategic priorities while properly assessing and mitigating risks from bilateral relations, for example, in its reduction of investment size in Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects. While two concepts are analytically distinct, collectively they fulfil a task of offering a more nuanced and contextually grounded picture of Myanmar’s external engagement, demonstrating how the NLD government diversified its external relations to reduce its overreliance on China while simultaneously engaging with it in a prudent manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives Global Local Political
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251412994
Primary Topic
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Hedging and Bandwagoning: Approaching Myanmar’s Engagement With External Powers Through the Lens of Diversification and Prudence (2016–2021)

Thu Htet
Alternatives Global Local Political
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
article

Beyond Hedging and Bandwagoning: Approaching Myanmar’s Engagement With External Powers Through the Lens of Diversification and Prudence (2016–2021)

Thu Htet
article en

Abstract

Recent studies on Myanmar’s foreign relations during its democratic transition (2011–2021) focus on its relations vis-à-vis great powers through the lens of hedging and bandwagoning. This article puts forward diversification and prudence as alternative conceptual frameworks that foreground our analysis on small states’ agency and preferences in approaching Myanmar’s external engagement during the period of National League for Democracy (NLD) government. During the period, Myanmar diversified its relations with major regional and extra-regional powers such as, but not limited to, Japan, India and Russia in different issue areas (military, economic and ideational). In parallel, the NLD, or Daw Suu in particular, considered China to be an indispensable partner due to its geopolitical and strategic importance. Therefore, it pursued benefits from China that aligned with the government’s strategic priorities while properly assessing and mitigating risks from bilateral relations, for example, in its reduction of investment size in Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects. While two concepts are analytically distinct, collectively they fulfil a task of offering a more nuanced and contextually grounded picture of Myanmar’s external engagement, demonstrating how the NLD government diversified its external relations to reduce its overreliance on China while simultaneously engaging with it in a prudent manner.

Alternatives Global Local Political
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond Hedging and Bandwagoning: Approaching Myanmar’s Engagement With External Powers Through the Lens of Diversification and Prudence (2016–2021) — Thu Htet · Alternatives Global Local Political (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS