A comprehensive review of risks and mitigation strategies for safe hydrogen infrastructure deployment

As hydrogen gains momentum as a clean and versatile energy carrier for decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors, ensuring the safety of hydrogen infrastructure becomes critical for its widespread adoption. This review draws on peer-reviewed literature, industrial reports, and international standards for hydrogen technologies. It systematically examines safety risks across the hydrogen value chain, from production to end-of-life and assesses the effectiveness of existing mitigation strategies as well as identifying key research gaps. Common risks such as hydrogen leaks, over-pressurization, and material degradation are present at nearly every stage. Less frequent but potentially severe hazards include the risk of ice formation or equipment damage from cryogenic hydrogen leaks, and toxic exposures from chemical carriers like ammonia or hydrides used for hydrogen storage and transport. The mitigation technologies evaluated include leak detection systems, quick-release valves, emergency ventilation, and both material-based and physical barrier systems. While these safety solutions provide considerable protective potential, their long-term effectiveness depends on real-time responsiveness, and regulatory enforcement. The review also highlights critical gaps in predictive modeling, material durability under extreme conditions exacerbated by climate change, and human error analysis. Emerging technologies, such as AI-enabled safety systems and digital twins, remain underexplored, and current hydrogen safety frameworks have a limited understanding of hydrogen combustion behavior and effective fire suppression strategies. To support the safe and scalable deployment of hydrogen infrastructure, the study calls for targeted research, stakeholder education, and harmonized safety standards. This review provides a timely synthesis of risks and controls to guide future development, policy, and innovation in hydrogen safety. This review will support industry stakeholders, and researchers in developing safer, more reliable, and standardized hydrogen infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Chemical Engineering
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2026.1721648
Primary Topic
Combustion and Detonation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comprehensive review of risks and mitigation strategies for safe hydrogen infrastructure deployment

Andrea Correa, Michael Försth, Cecilia Wallmark, Solomon Asante-Okyere et al.
Frontiers in Chemical Engineering
Combustion and Detonation Processes
article

A comprehensive review of risks and mitigation strategies for safe hydrogen infrastructure deployment

Andrea Correa, Michael Försth, Cecilia Wallmark, Solomon Asante-Okyere, Rhoda Afriyie Mensah
article en

Abstract

As hydrogen gains momentum as a clean and versatile energy carrier for decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors, ensuring the safety of hydrogen infrastructure becomes critical for its widespread adoption. This review draws on peer-reviewed literature, industrial reports, and international standards for hydrogen technologies. It systematically examines safety risks across the hydrogen value chain, from production to end-of-life and assesses the effectiveness of existing mitigation strategies as well as identifying key research gaps. Common risks such as hydrogen leaks, over-pressurization, and material degradation are present at nearly every stage. Less frequent but potentially severe hazards include the risk of ice formation or equipment damage from cryogenic hydrogen leaks, and toxic exposures from chemical carriers like ammonia or hydrides used for hydrogen storage and transport. The mitigation technologies evaluated include leak detection systems, quick-release valves, emergency ventilation, and both material-based and physical barrier systems. While these safety solutions provide considerable protective potential, their long-term effectiveness depends on real-time responsiveness, and regulatory enforcement. The review also highlights critical gaps in predictive modeling, material durability under extreme conditions exacerbated by climate change, and human error analysis. Emerging technologies, such as AI-enabled safety systems and digital twins, remain underexplored, and current hydrogen safety frameworks have a limited understanding of hydrogen combustion behavior and effective fire suppression strategies. To support the safe and scalable deployment of hydrogen infrastructure, the study calls for targeted research, stakeholder education, and harmonized safety standards. This review provides a timely synthesis of risks and controls to guide future development, policy, and innovation in hydrogen safety. This review will support industry stakeholders, and researchers in developing safer, more reliable, and standardized hydrogen infrastructure.

Frontiers in Chemical EngineeringVol. 8
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Combustion and Detonation Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.