From Effective to Affective Research-Practice Partnerships (RPP): Bridging Empirical and Post-Qualitative Approaches to Study RPPs as Affective Cultural Forms

This study experiments with post-qualitative methodologies to understand research-practice partnerships (RPPs) as affective and cultural forms. Revisiting data from an ethnographic case study of a RPP, and drawing on affect and cultural studies, I develop “scene-cases” to trace how teachers attach to professional-managerial metaphors as modes of recovery from institutional precarity, while students attune to institutional ghosts and ruins, generating detachment from improvement narratives. The analysis reveals how RPPs function as sites where differential affective orientations complicate assumptions of RPPs’ inherent goodness. RPPs can simultaneously offer recovery from precarity for some participants while catalyzing refusal in others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Inquiry
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004251414999
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Effective to Affective Research-Practice Partnerships (RPP): Bridging Empirical and Post-Qualitative Approaches to Study RPPs as Affective Cultural Forms

Blanca Gamez-Djokic
Qualitative Inquiry
Educational Assessment and Improvement
article

From Effective to Affective Research-Practice Partnerships (RPP): Bridging Empirical and Post-Qualitative Approaches to Study RPPs as Affective Cultural Forms

Blanca Gamez-Djokic
article en

Abstract

This study experiments with post-qualitative methodologies to understand research-practice partnerships (RPPs) as affective and cultural forms. Revisiting data from an ethnographic case study of a RPP, and drawing on affect and cultural studies, I develop “scene-cases” to trace how teachers attach to professional-managerial metaphors as modes of recovery from institutional precarity, while students attune to institutional ghosts and ruins, generating detachment from improvement narratives. The analysis reveals how RPPs function as sites where differential affective orientations complicate assumptions of RPPs’ inherent goodness. RPPs can simultaneously offer recovery from precarity for some participants while catalyzing refusal in others.

Qualitative Inquiry
National Louis University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.