Digital health tools for post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care: what we know, what we don’t, and why sex and gender matter

Digital health tools (DHTs) offer promising opportunities to enhance post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care by supporting secondary prevention, medication adherence, lifestyle modification, and remote monitoring. Evidence indicates that DHTs can improve physiological, behavioural, and psychosocial outcomes; however, sex- and gender-specific effects remain largely unstudied. Concurrently, women and gender-diverse individuals continue to experience disparities in all aspects of ACS care, including underdiagnosis, delayed treatment, and lower cardiac rehabilitation participation. This review synthesizes the current evidence on DHTs in post-ACS care, identifies knowledge gaps in sex- and gender-sensitive outcomes, and proposes strategies for designing, implementing, and evaluating inclusive interventions. Intentional integration of sex- and gender-sensitive approaches is essential to achieve equitable benefits and optimized recovery for all patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Physiology
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2026.100900
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital health tools for post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care: what we know, what we don’t, and why sex and gender matter

Andrea de Haan, David Kent, Shuangbo Liu, Thang Nguyen et al.
Current Opinion in Physiology
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Digital health tools for post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care: what we know, what we don’t, and why sex and gender matter

Andrea de Haan, David Kent, Shuangbo Liu, Thang Nguyen, Arshia Bonakdar
article en

Abstract

Digital health tools (DHTs) offer promising opportunities to enhance post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care by supporting secondary prevention, medication adherence, lifestyle modification, and remote monitoring. Evidence indicates that DHTs can improve physiological, behavioural, and psychosocial outcomes; however, sex- and gender-specific effects remain largely unstudied. Concurrently, women and gender-diverse individuals continue to experience disparities in all aspects of ACS care, including underdiagnosis, delayed treatment, and lower cardiac rehabilitation participation. This review synthesizes the current evidence on DHTs in post-ACS care, identifies knowledge gaps in sex- and gender-sensitive outcomes, and proposes strategies for designing, implementing, and evaluating inclusive interventions. Intentional integration of sex- and gender-sensitive approaches is essential to achieve equitable benefits and optimized recovery for all patients.

Current Opinion in PhysiologyVol. 47
St. Boniface Hospital (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital health tools for post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care: what we know, what we don’t, and why sex and gender matter — Andrea de Haan, David Kent, et al. · Current Opinion in Physiology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS