Disconnected Lives: Social Networks and Emotional Regulation in Domestic Dogs

Dogs are deeply social, built to stay in touch with others of their kind. In cities, though, most now live as single dogs. Housing rules, work schedules, and constant supervision have constrained their social environment. They still meet other dogs, but the meetings are short, managed, and rarely turn into real bonds. This review tries to pull together what is known about how such limited contact affects canine welfare and emotional balance. The sources come mostly from ethology, psychology, and urban studies, published between 2010 and 2025, and include comparisons between urban pets and free-ranging dogs that still organise their own social lives. Across studies, the pattern is similar: when dogs lose steady companions, they also lose the kind of social buffering that once helped them recover from stress. Over time, this does not always look like distress-more often it shows up as quiet tension, watchfulness, or an overdependence on human cues. The evidence points to social deprivation as a slow, structural welfare issue rather than an occasional problem. Meaningful improvement may therefore require moving beyond control and training alone, toward conditions that allow dogs to form small, stable circles of familiar peers that support lower arousal and more reliable recovery.