Am I your type? Automated similarity search for 3D scanned archaeological artefacts

Ornamental metal artefacts are central to many archaeological classifications and typologies. Inconsistent classification systems and large numbers of finds, meanwhile, challenges identification. As 3D digitization of cultural heritage data becomes increasingly widespread, automated feature recognition offers potential to augment research. However, existing algorithms used for computer vision are ineffective for similarity search in 3D data. Here we analyse a sample set of 12 objects comprising complete artefacts and fragments pertaining to clearly distinct typological groups. In this paper, wevoxelize the 3D meshes and perform a pairwise point cloud registration to cluster the artefacts into groups using a distance measure. This method is found to correctly identify positive matches but struggles to compare fragments or pieces of very different size. We conclude that the method is viable, but distance measure must be further elaborated to take into consideration the number of points in point clouds as source and target. • Similarity search correctly identifies typology in 3D scanned artefacts. • Pairwise point cloud registration to cluster the artefacts into groups identifies positive matches, and highlights limitations in comparing fragments or pieces of very different size. • Pairwise point cloud registration to cluster the artefacts into groups identifies positive matches, and highlights limitations in comparing fragments or pieces of very different size. • The potential and challenges for the use of AI computer vision in 3D data is outlined.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2026.e00501
Primary Topic
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Am I your type? Automated similarity search for 3D scanned archaeological artefacts

Peter Ahrendt, Søren M. Sindbæk, Derek James Parrott, Tue J. Boesen et al.
Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
article

Am I your type? Automated similarity search for 3D scanned archaeological artefacts

Peter Ahrendt, Søren M. Sindbæk, Derek James Parrott, Tue J. Boesen, Ivan Adriyanov Nikolov
article en

Abstract

Ornamental metal artefacts are central to many archaeological classifications and typologies. Inconsistent classification systems and large numbers of finds, meanwhile, challenges identification. As 3D digitization of cultural heritage data becomes increasingly widespread, automated feature recognition offers potential to augment research. However, existing algorithms used for computer vision are ineffective for similarity search in 3D data. Here we analyse a sample set of 12 objects comprising complete artefacts and fragments pertaining to clearly distinct typological groups. In this paper, wevoxelize the 3D meshes and perform a pairwise point cloud registration to cluster the artefacts into groups using a distance measure. This method is found to correctly identify positive matches but struggles to compare fragments or pieces of very different size. We conclude that the method is viable, but distance measure must be further elaborated to take into consideration the number of points in point clouds as source and target. • Similarity search correctly identifies typology in 3D scanned artefacts. • Pairwise point cloud registration to cluster the artefacts into groups identifies positive matches, and highlights limitations in comparing fragments or pieces of very different size. • Pairwise point cloud registration to cluster the artefacts into groups identifies positive matches, and highlights limitations in comparing fragments or pieces of very different size. • The potential and challenges for the use of AI computer vision in 3D data is outlined.

Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural HeritageVol. 40
Moesgaard Museum (DK), Alexandra Institute (Denmark) (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.