Preparing the next generation of Complex Networks and Systems scientists: Evaluation results for the Complex Networks and Systems NSF research training program at Indiana University

Assessing and evaluating programmatic outcomes of graduate education programs help stakeholders understand and respond to challenges that emerge over the course of a complex academic program. Given the increased complexity of program activities and outcomes, there is a need for semi-automatic, interactive visual analytics tools that transform data into actionable insights to inform decision-making. This paper documents the results of the evaluation planning and annual workflow setup to create dynamic assessment reports for the Complex Networks and Systems NSF Research Traineeship (CNS NRT) program at Indiana University. The CNS NRT evaluation workflow relied on institutional, survey, and publication data and the freely available tools to guide decision making and communicate the achievements of faculty and doctoral trainees who participated in the program between 2017 and 2024. The evaluation data to date show that the program is judged by participants as meeting its goals and that there has been considerable evidence of research productivity as indicated in the publication data. These clear gains in short-term outcomes show that the CNS NRT is on a pathway to achieving the medium and longer-term goals of the project, which will be examined over a longer period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334779
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparing the next generation of Complex Networks and Systems scientists: Evaluation results for the Complex Networks and Systems NSF research training program at Indiana University

Katy Börner, Selma Šabanović, Luis M. Rocha, Michael Ginda et al.
PLoS ONE
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Preparing the next generation of Complex Networks and Systems scientists: Evaluation results for the Complex Networks and Systems NSF research training program at Indiana University

Katy Börner, Selma Šabanović, Luis M. Rocha, Michael Ginda, William Trochim, Olga Scrivner
article en

Abstract

Assessing and evaluating programmatic outcomes of graduate education programs help stakeholders understand and respond to challenges that emerge over the course of a complex academic program. Given the increased complexity of program activities and outcomes, there is a need for semi-automatic, interactive visual analytics tools that transform data into actionable insights to inform decision-making. This paper documents the results of the evaluation planning and annual workflow setup to create dynamic assessment reports for the Complex Networks and Systems NSF Research Traineeship (CNS NRT) program at Indiana University. The CNS NRT evaluation workflow relied on institutional, survey, and publication data and the freely available tools to guide decision making and communicate the achievements of faculty and doctoral trainees who participated in the program between 2017 and 2024. The evaluation data to date show that the program is judged by participants as meeting its goals and that there has been considerable evidence of research productivity as indicated in the publication data. These clear gains in short-term outcomes show that the CNS NRT is on a pathway to achieving the medium and longer-term goals of the project, which will be examined over a longer period.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(1)
Binghamton University (US), Rose–Hulman Institute of Technology (US), Cornell University (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.