Comparison of fetal weight by ultrasound with actual birth weight

Introduction: Comparison of fetal weight by ultrasound with actual birth weight is significant for clinical management as it is very closely linked with the survival and well-being of a fetus. Sonographic fetal weight estimation is an essential component of antenatal care. Hence, ultrasonography has become a vital tool in modern obstetrics practice. However, the reliability of the result depends a lot on the quality of the machine and the skill of the sonographer. Actual birth weights are measured with a scale corrected for zero error before use. Methods: This is a retrospective study in which clients under regular follow-up were sent from the Gynaecology and Obstetrics department, undergoing routine antenatal ultrasound to assess fetal well-being. Considering ultrasound at term (37-41 weeks), the data were retrieved, and a comparison was made between fetal weight by ultrasound and actual birth weight. Results: Women, 214 in number, who delivered in Patan Academy of Health Sciences were enrolled in this study. The mean estimated fetal weight was 2995.11(± SD 383.42) grams, and the mean of actual birth weight was 3033.15 (± SD 501.47) grams. The correlation coefficient between fetal weight estimated by USG and actual birth weight was 0.907 (p < 0.001), indicating a strong positive linear correlation. Conclusion: Ultrasonography is an essential tool for estimating fetal weight before delivery in term pregnancies, with no significant difference from actual birth weight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Karnali Academy of Health Sciences
Published
2026-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61814/jkahs.v8i3.1151
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of fetal weight by ultrasound with actual birth weight

Pooja Jaiswal, Shreejana Shrestha, Prabhat Karki, Yogita Manandhar Dwa
Journal of Karnali Academy of Health Sciences
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Comparison of fetal weight by ultrasound with actual birth weight

Pooja Jaiswal, Shreejana Shrestha, Prabhat Karki, Yogita Manandhar Dwa
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Comparison of fetal weight by ultrasound with actual birth weight is significant for clinical management as it is very closely linked with the survival and well-being of a fetus. Sonographic fetal weight estimation is an essential component of antenatal care. Hence, ultrasonography has become a vital tool in modern obstetrics practice. However, the reliability of the result depends a lot on the quality of the machine and the skill of the sonographer. Actual birth weights are measured with a scale corrected for zero error before use. Methods: This is a retrospective study in which clients under regular follow-up were sent from the Gynaecology and Obstetrics department, undergoing routine antenatal ultrasound to assess fetal well-being. Considering ultrasound at term (37-41 weeks), the data were retrieved, and a comparison was made between fetal weight by ultrasound and actual birth weight. Results: Women, 214 in number, who delivered in Patan Academy of Health Sciences were enrolled in this study. The mean estimated fetal weight was 2995.11(± SD 383.42) grams, and the mean of actual birth weight was 3033.15 (± SD 501.47) grams. The correlation coefficient between fetal weight estimated by USG and actual birth weight was 0.907 (p < 0.001), indicating a strong positive linear correlation. Conclusion: Ultrasonography is an essential tool for estimating fetal weight before delivery in term pregnancies, with no significant difference from actual birth weight.

Journal of Karnali Academy of Health SciencesVol. 8(3)
Patan Academy of Health Sciences (NP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.