Implementing Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) into pharmaceutical innovation

Pharmaceuticals are essential in modern healthcare but can also pose threats for the environment, starting from their resource intensive synthesis to the release of active compounds into ecosystems. The new framework of Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) by the European Commission addresses simultaneously safety and sustainability during chemical and material development. The general SSbD framework needs to be implemented and targeted to different fields and materials. We present here a sector-specific implementation of the SSbD framework to pharmaceuticals, ensuring that drug efficacy and patient safety remain paramount while assessing the environmental and socio-economic impacts. We propose three levels of integration of the SSbD framework, demonstrating where and how safety and sustainability criteria can be most effectively integrated during pharmaceutical R&D. Each of the SSbD framework's steps is interpreted to address unique pharmaceutical concerns. The approach aligns the Hazard Assessment with pharmaceutical regulation and environmental screening; Safe Production and Processing with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP); Exposure and safety during exposure with pharmacokinetics models such as ADME; Environmental Sustainability Assessment with metrics such as Process Mass Intensity (PMI) and Ex-Ante Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and the Socio-Economic Assessment with tools like Life Cycle Costing (LCC), Social LCA (S-LCA) and the Handprint approach. Finally, a cost analysis confirms that embedding SSbD during the pharmaceutical R&D increases expenditures only slightly. The suggested approach provides a practical roadmap for aligning pharmaceutical innovation with pressing ecological and societal goals without compromising the crucial pursuit of effective, life-saving therapies. • We propose a tailored roadmap for the implementation of SSbD for pharmaceuticals. • Three integration levels are introduced to embed SSbD in real-world drug development. • Aligns ADME, PMI, LCA, and Handprint Approach for sustainable pharmaceuticals. • A cost analysis shows that SSbD implementation adds <0.2 % to the R&D costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.147280
Primary Topic
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) into pharmaceutical innovation

Roland Hischier, Bernd Nowack, Jacopo Sorani
Journal of Cleaner Production
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
article

Implementing Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) into pharmaceutical innovation

Roland Hischier, Bernd Nowack, Jacopo Sorani
article en

Abstract

Pharmaceuticals are essential in modern healthcare but can also pose threats for the environment, starting from their resource intensive synthesis to the release of active compounds into ecosystems. The new framework of Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) by the European Commission addresses simultaneously safety and sustainability during chemical and material development. The general SSbD framework needs to be implemented and targeted to different fields and materials. We present here a sector-specific implementation of the SSbD framework to pharmaceuticals, ensuring that drug efficacy and patient safety remain paramount while assessing the environmental and socio-economic impacts. We propose three levels of integration of the SSbD framework, demonstrating where and how safety and sustainability criteria can be most effectively integrated during pharmaceutical R&D. Each of the SSbD framework's steps is interpreted to address unique pharmaceutical concerns. The approach aligns the Hazard Assessment with pharmaceutical regulation and environmental screening; Safe Production and Processing with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP); Exposure and safety during exposure with pharmacokinetics models such as ADME; Environmental Sustainability Assessment with metrics such as Process Mass Intensity (PMI) and Ex-Ante Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and the Socio-Economic Assessment with tools like Life Cycle Costing (LCC), Social LCA (S-LCA) and the Handprint approach. Finally, a cost analysis confirms that embedding SSbD during the pharmaceutical R&D increases expenditures only slightly. The suggested approach provides a practical roadmap for aligning pharmaceutical innovation with pressing ecological and societal goals without compromising the crucial pursuit of effective, life-saving therapies. • We propose a tailored roadmap for the implementation of SSbD for pharmaceuticals. • Three integration levels are introduced to embed SSbD in real-world drug development. • Aligns ADME, PMI, LCA, and Handprint Approach for sustainable pharmaceuticals. • A cost analysis shows that SSbD implementation adds <0.2 % to the R&D costs.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 543
Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (CH)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.