Evaluating the Policy Effects of Korea’s Inbound Startup Program: An Empirical Study Based on KSGC (2017–2024) Panel Data

This study empirically examines the policy effects of Korea’s inbound startup program using panel data from the K-Startup Grand Challenge (2017–2024). Quantitative analysis investigates how programmatic support, localization capability, and institutional clarity influence the settlement performance and survival of foreign startups in Korea. Qualitative comparison of high- and low-performing teams complements the statistical findings by revealing underlying mechanisms. Results indicate that programmatic support, localization, and institutional clarity positively affect settlement outcomes, with localization acting as a mediator and institutional clarity serving as a moderator that strengthens the effects. The study suggests that Korea’s inbound startup policy should transition from short-term attraction to a settlement- and localization-oriented framework. It contributes to international entrepreneurship literature by identifying the interplay between institutional environments and localization processes within public acceleration programs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Korea Service Management Society
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15706/jksms.2025.26.5.003
Primary Topic
International Business and FDI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Policy Effects of Korea’s Inbound Startup Program: An Empirical Study Based on KSGC (2017–2024) Panel Data

Hwa Seong Jeon, Jung-Min Nam, Min Jung Kim
Journal of Korea Service Management Society
International Business and FDI
article

Evaluating the Policy Effects of Korea’s Inbound Startup Program: An Empirical Study Based on KSGC (2017–2024) Panel Data

Hwa Seong Jeon, Jung-Min Nam, Min Jung Kim
article en

Abstract

This study empirically examines the policy effects of Korea’s inbound startup program using panel data from the K-Startup Grand Challenge (2017–2024). Quantitative analysis investigates how programmatic support, localization capability, and institutional clarity influence the settlement performance and survival of foreign startups in Korea. Qualitative comparison of high- and low-performing teams complements the statistical findings by revealing underlying mechanisms. Results indicate that programmatic support, localization, and institutional clarity positively affect settlement outcomes, with localization acting as a mediator and institutional clarity serving as a moderator that strengthens the effects. The study suggests that Korea’s inbound startup policy should transition from short-term attraction to a settlement- and localization-oriented framework. It contributes to international entrepreneurship literature by identifying the interplay between institutional environments and localization processes within public acceleration programs.

Journal of Korea Service Management SocietyVol. 26(5)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
International Business and FDI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.