Comparing Statistical and Machine-Learning Models for Seasonal Prediction of Atlantic Hurricane Activity

Tropical cyclones pose major risks to life and property, especially as coastal populations grow and climate change increases the likelihood of intense storms, making seasonal prediction of tropical cyclones an important scientific and societal goal. This study uses HURDAT best-track records from 1950 to 2024 to quantify annual tropical cyclone, hurricane, and major hurricane counts across the Atlantic basin, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico. These nine targets are paired with 34 monthly climate predictors from NOAA and NASA GISS—including SST and ENSO indices, Main Development Region (MDR) wind and pressure fields, and latent heat flux empirical orthogonal functions—evaluated under nine predictor-set configurations. Four forecasting approaches were developed and tested under operationally realistic conditions—Lasso regression, K-nearest neighbors (KNN), an artificial neural network (ANN), XGBoost—using a 30-year sliding-window cross-validation design and a Poisson log-likelihood skill score relative to climatology. Lasso performs reliably with concise, physically interpretable predictors, while XGBoost provides the most consistent overall skill, particularly for basin-wide total cyclone and hurricane counts. The skill of ANN is limited by small sample sizes, and KNN offers only marginal improvements. Forecast skill is the highest for basin-wide storm totals and decreases for regional major-hurricane targets due to lower event frequencies and stronger predictability limits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17020129
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
40.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Statistical and Machine-Learning Models for Seasonal Prediction of Atlantic Hurricane Activity

Lian Xie, Xiaoran Chen
1 citations
Atmosphere
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
40.64
article

Comparing Statistical and Machine-Learning Models for Seasonal Prediction of Atlantic Hurricane Activity

Lian Xie, Xiaoran Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Tropical cyclones pose major risks to life and property, especially as coastal populations grow and climate change increases the likelihood of intense storms, making seasonal prediction of tropical cyclones an important scientific and societal goal. This study uses HURDAT best-track records from 1950 to 2024 to quantify annual tropical cyclone, hurricane, and major hurricane counts across the Atlantic basin, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico. These nine targets are paired with 34 monthly climate predictors from NOAA and NASA GISS—including SST and ENSO indices, Main Development Region (MDR) wind and pressure fields, and latent heat flux empirical orthogonal functions—evaluated under nine predictor-set configurations. Four forecasting approaches were developed and tested under operationally realistic conditions—Lasso regression, K-nearest neighbors (KNN), an artificial neural network (ANN), XGBoost—using a 30-year sliding-window cross-validation design and a Poisson log-likelihood skill score relative to climatology. Lasso performs reliably with concise, physically interpretable predictors, while XGBoost provides the most consistent overall skill, particularly for basin-wide total cyclone and hurricane counts. The skill of ANN is limited by small sample sizes, and KNN offers only marginal improvements. Forecast skill is the highest for basin-wide storm totals and decreases for regional major-hurricane targets due to lower event frequencies and stronger predictability limits.

AtmosphereVol. 17(2)
North Carolina State University (US), Green Valley High School (US)
North Carolina State University
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
40.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.