Are We the Welfare Office? Managing Administrative Burden in a Guaranteed-Income Pilot

Despite increased attention to the phenomenon of administrative burdens, we know less about efforts to minimize these burdens, particularly how those efforts affect frontline staff. This article addresses the gap by analyzing documents gathered and generated by the authors as they implemented a guaranteed-income pilot in Ann Arbor, Michigan, intentionally designed to lessen administrative burdens on applicants. The findings highlight the challenges of putting burden-reducing practices into place and the tensions that emerge, including those between reducing administrative burdens and being accountable for the spending of public dollars. Moreover, we contribute to the literature on administrative burden by uncovering an additional role that administrative burdens can serve—namely, as a device to protect an organization’s professional reputation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Service Review
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/739424
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are We the Welfare Office? Managing Administrative Burden in a Guaranteed-Income Pilot

Y. C. Chen, Dana Schau, Kristin S. Seefeldt, Emily Shupp Parker et al.
Social Service Review
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Are We the Welfare Office? Managing Administrative Burden in a Guaranteed-Income Pilot

Y. C. Chen, Dana Schau, Kristin S. Seefeldt, Emily Shupp Parker, Leonymae Aumentado
article en

Abstract

Despite increased attention to the phenomenon of administrative burdens, we know less about efforts to minimize these burdens, particularly how those efforts affect frontline staff. This article addresses the gap by analyzing documents gathered and generated by the authors as they implemented a guaranteed-income pilot in Ann Arbor, Michigan, intentionally designed to lessen administrative burdens on applicants. The findings highlight the challenges of putting burden-reducing practices into place and the tensions that emerge, including those between reducing administrative burdens and being accountable for the spending of public dollars. Moreover, we contribute to the literature on administrative burden by uncovering an additional role that administrative burdens can serve—namely, as a device to protect an organization’s professional reputation.

Social Service ReviewVol. 100(1)
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (US), University of Michigan (US), Michigan Medicine (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.