Separation bubble shaped control bumps for turbulent oblique shock wave–boundary-layer interactions

An experimental investigation of separation bubble shaped control bumps for oblique shock wave–boundary-layer interactions was performed in two supersonic wind tunnel facilities at Mach 2.5 and 2, with incident shock deflection angles of $8^\circ$ and $12^\circ$ , respectively, and momentum thickness Reynolds numbers of approximately $1.5 \times 10^4$ . Shock control bumps were designed to replicate the time-averaged separation bubble shape, and were placed onto the floor in the separation location. This resulted in almost complete elimination of flow separation. There was also a marked improvement in the downstream boundary-layer state. A low-frequency bubble breathing oscillation was identified in the baseline interaction using high-speed shadowgraphy and particle image velocimetry measurements. This oscillation was strongly suppressed in the controlled interactions. Velocity fluctuations in the downstream boundary layer were also significantly reduced. We propose that the key mechanism by which flow separation is eliminated is by breaking down the overall pressure rise into smaller steps, each of which is below the separation threshold. A key feature is the bump crest expansion fan, located near to where the incident shock terminates, which negates the shock induced pressure jump. Thus, the precise bump geometry is critical for control efficacy and should be designed to manage these pressure rise steps as well as the expansion fan strength and location with respect to the incident shock wave. The length of the bump faces must also be sufficiently long for the boundary layer to recover between successive adverse pressure jumps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2026-01-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2025.11094
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Separation bubble shaped control bumps for turbulent oblique shock wave–boundary-layer interactions

Jane Bulut, Timothy Missing, Ferry Schrijer, Holger Babinsky et al.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
article

Separation bubble shaped control bumps for turbulent oblique shock wave–boundary-layer interactions

Jane Bulut, Timothy Missing, Ferry Schrijer, Holger Babinsky, Bas W. van Oudheusden
article en

Abstract

An experimental investigation of separation bubble shaped control bumps for oblique shock wave–boundary-layer interactions was performed in two supersonic wind tunnel facilities at Mach 2.5 and 2, with incident shock deflection angles of $8^\circ$ and $12^\circ$ , respectively, and momentum thickness Reynolds numbers of approximately $1.5 \times 10^4$ . Shock control bumps were designed to replicate the time-averaged separation bubble shape, and were placed onto the floor in the separation location. This resulted in almost complete elimination of flow separation. There was also a marked improvement in the downstream boundary-layer state. A low-frequency bubble breathing oscillation was identified in the baseline interaction using high-speed shadowgraphy and particle image velocimetry measurements. This oscillation was strongly suppressed in the controlled interactions. Velocity fluctuations in the downstream boundary layer were also significantly reduced. We propose that the key mechanism by which flow separation is eliminated is by breaking down the overall pressure rise into smaller steps, each of which is below the separation threshold. A key feature is the bump crest expansion fan, located near to where the incident shock terminates, which negates the shock induced pressure jump. Thus, the precise bump geometry is critical for control efficacy and should be designed to manage these pressure rise steps as well as the expansion fan strength and location with respect to the incident shock wave. The length of the bump faces must also be sufficiently long for the boundary layer to recover between successive adverse pressure jumps.

Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 1028
University of Cambridge (GB), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.