Naloxegol, an Oral Peripherally Acting Opioid Receptor Antagonist, Administered Concurrently with First-Line Systemic Therapy for Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma (Alliance A221504): A Feasibility and Safety Study

<b>Background</b>: Mu opioid receptors (MORs) in peripheral tissues mediate adverse effects of opioids that impair health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and may stimulate cancer progression via mitogenic signaling. Naloxegol, a peripherally acting MOR antagonist (PAMORA), is approved for opioid-induced constipation. Safety and efficacy of naloxegol have not been evaluated concurrently with systemic cancer therapy. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of naloxegol in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma starting first-line systemic therapy. <b>Results</b>: Only 50 patients were enrolled; the trial was terminated early due to slow accrual. Two of the three components of the feasibility primary endpoint were not met (accrual and PRO completion). At 6 months, FACT-L emotional well-being was better with naloxegol (<i>p</i> = 0.0113). There were trends towards better Trial Outcome Index (<i>p</i> = 0.0505) and physical well-being (<i>p</i> = 0.0628) with naloxegol. Bowel function favored naloxegol for constipation (<i>p</i> = 0.0223), rectal pain during defecation (<i>p</i> = 0.0075), and abdominal pain from constipation (<i>p</i> = 0.0113). Adverse event frequency and severity, PRO-CTCAE, urinary hesitancy, pain scores, and progression-free and overall survival were comparable between naloxegol and placebo. <b>Conclusions</b>: Naloxegol appears to be safe and tolerable, with a signal of improved HRQoL and previously unappreciated benefit for emotional well-being, without adverse clinical outcomes. Our findings should be confirmed in larger studies. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03087708.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-01-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18030373
Primary Topic
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Naloxegol, an Oral Peripherally Acting Opioid Receptor Antagonist, Administered Concurrently with First-Line Systemic Therapy for Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma (Alliance A221504): A Feasibility and Safety Study

Kalpna Gupta, Robert Kratzke, Sean P. Pitroda, Pankaj Gupta et al.
Cancers
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
article

Naloxegol, an Oral Peripherally Acting Opioid Receptor Antagonist, Administered Concurrently with First-Line Systemic Therapy for Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma (Alliance A221504): A Feasibility and Safety Study

Kalpna Gupta, Robert Kratzke, Sean P. Pitroda, Pankaj Gupta, Travis Dockter, Shelby A. Terstriep, Kathryn Ruddy, Selina Lai-ming Chow, Chao Huang, Lyudmila Bazhenova, Charles L. Loprinzi, Elizabeth Harlos, Niveditha Subbiah
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Mu opioid receptors (MORs) in peripheral tissues mediate adverse effects of opioids that impair health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and may stimulate cancer progression via mitogenic signaling. Naloxegol, a peripherally acting MOR antagonist (PAMORA), is approved for opioid-induced constipation. Safety and efficacy of naloxegol have not been evaluated concurrently with systemic cancer therapy. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of naloxegol in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma starting first-line systemic therapy. <b>Results</b>: Only 50 patients were enrolled; the trial was terminated early due to slow accrual. Two of the three components of the feasibility primary endpoint were not met (accrual and PRO completion). At 6 months, FACT-L emotional well-being was better with naloxegol (<i>p</i> = 0.0113). There were trends towards better Trial Outcome Index (<i>p</i> = 0.0505) and physical well-being (<i>p</i> = 0.0628) with naloxegol. Bowel function favored naloxegol for constipation (<i>p</i> = 0.0223), rectal pain during defecation (<i>p</i> = 0.0075), and abdominal pain from constipation (<i>p</i> = 0.0113). Adverse event frequency and severity, PRO-CTCAE, urinary hesitancy, pain scores, and progression-free and overall survival were comparable between naloxegol and placebo. <b>Conclusions</b>: Naloxegol appears to be safe and tolerable, with a signal of improved HRQoL and previously unappreciated benefit for emotional well-being, without adverse clinical outcomes. Our findings should be confirmed in larger studies. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03087708.

CancersVol. 18(3)
University of Minnesota (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (US), University of California San Diego (US), University of Chicago (US), The University of Kansas Cancer Center (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Alliance Data (United States) (US), Fargo VA Health Care System (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), VA Long Beach Healthcare System (US), Kansas City VA Medical Center (US)
AstraZeneca
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.